Accepting that the BIBFRAME model is intended to be "content standard agnostic", I can see how FRBR expressions might be accommodated as what ISTC (International Standard Text Code) calls "original works" (which could also be used in the BIBFRAME model to generate the label for an overarching "FRBR work") and "derived works" (which in the ISTC model are conveniently linked to the original works from which they are ultimately derived). But one problem remains in the treatment of adaptations, which ISTC treats as derived works but FRBR treats as original works. Agnosticism can only take one so far.
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego, Calif.)
-----Original Message-----
From: Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ford, Kevin
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 3:32 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [BIBFRAME] BIBFRAME model document announced
Accommodating RDA is an active area of development. A few of the early experimenters mentioned in the announcement are, in fact, investigating how the BIBFRAME model, while remaining content standard agnostic, can meet the needs of RDA. It is worth recalling that the "broad accommodation of content rules and data models" was the first requirement listed when the General Plan was announced in October 2011 [1]. The "accommodation of RDA" was chief among the content rules listed. Nothing has changed with respect to this requirement.
It may be that an RDA Work and RDA Expression are bound up in a BIBFRAME Work, with BIBFRAME Instance being most closely associated to RDA Manifestation, and the notion of an Item captured as a BIBFRAME Holding, all as you surmise. This is where qualitative community discussion about these important issues is crucial. Thanks for getting it started.
Cordially,
Kevin
[1] http://www.loc.gov/marc/transition/news/framework-103111.html
--
Kevin Ford
Network Development and MARC Standards Office Library of Congress Washington, DC
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod
> Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 5:41 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [BIBFRAME] BIBFRAME model document announced
>
> >http://www.loc.gov/marc/transition/pdf/marcld-report-11-21-2012.pdf
>
> Creative Work - a resource reflecting a conceptual essence of the
> cataloging item.
>
> Instance - a resource reflecting an individual, material embodiment
> of the Work.
>
> Authority - a resource reflecting key authority concepts that have
> defined relationships reflected in the Work and Instance. Examples of
> Authority Resources include People, Places, Topics, Organizations, etc.
>
> Annotation - a resource that decorates other BIBFRAME resources with
> additional information. Examples of such annotations include Library
> Holdings information, cover art and reviews.
>
> Are we to gather that RDA's "Work" is still a work, but that "Instance"
> replaces Manifestation, Expression is no more, and Item data is a part
> of annotation? Will WIAA or CIAA be our new acronym, replacing WEMI?
>
>
> __ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([log in to unmask])
> {__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
> ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________
|