LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME Archives

BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME  January 2013

BIBFRAME January 2013

Subject:

Re: Inviting community engagement on building a bibliographic roadmap

From:

Cindy Wolff <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:06:19 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (73 lines)

I'm subscribed to this list serv  and the one devoted to RDA. Certainly
there must be some dovetailing between the two to come up with a framework,
description and new products. Maybe there is something I am missing in what
I've been reading, but any frameworks and description standards seem to show
little regard each other, with NISO pretending bibframe and RDA  don't exist
at all and charging  for a web conference which for many of us is a hefty
sum.  We are all interested and curious about the larger picture all these
factions will form inside the library environment as well as outside and how
each will interact. 

We can also pretend we are operating outside any concern for the role of the
information professional and his/her utility in all this. Catalogers, or
anyone who creates and manages metadata, have adapted to changes in
standards. I am interested in seeing how this all works together in a new
environment, but I am also concerned that with all my adapting and support,
I will be considered obsolete before I truly am by higher-level
decision-makers. I think one unspoken hurdle to the "buy in" is the current
economic and business culture that jumps to earth-scorching conclusions
about how to migrate from "old school" to "new school".  The interest and
support is there to adapt, but professional judgment that is transferrable
should still matter in the new environment. 

There is also some hesitation working with the powerful publishing industry
and huge bibliographic utilities as part of this process when description
and access mean one thing to commercial interests and another to research
interests.

I could be mistaken. If there is something that RDA, BIBFRAME, and NISO are
already doing together, let me know. If collaboration is indeed in the form
of what's presented in the NISO webinar, which looks really interesting,
then it should be more affordable for more people to see. 

Cindy Wolff




-----Original Message-----
From: Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tom Morris
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 11:36 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [BIBFRAME] Inviting community engagement on building a
bibliographic roadmap

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Todd Carpenter <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Good afternoon, Bibliographic Exchange community,
>
> Last fall, the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation generously awarded the 
> National Information Standards Organization (NISO) with a grant to 
> support an initiative that will develop a community roadmap toward a 
> new bibliographic exchange environment.  This roadmap will help 
> support movement toward a future of bibliographic information exchange
ecosystem.

So NISO is taking over coordination of bibliographic information standards
from the Library of Congress?  Has the LC agreed to cede the field?

For all of its lack of transparency and other problems, at least the LC
isn't a "pay to play" organization like NISO.  The Mellon Foundation could
have subsidized the recent outrageously expensive BIBFRAME webinar instead.
That probably would have done more to advance the cause in the immediate
term than an 18 month study resulting in a report and no software,
standards, or any other work product.

Adding an additional group to the fray as a way to improve coordination
reminds me of this strip: http://xkcd.com/927/

Tom

p.s. How much was the grant for?  I'm curious what the going rate for a
meeting, 4 teleconferences, and a final report is these days.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager