LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for EDUCAT Archives


EDUCAT Archives

EDUCAT Archives


EDUCAT@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EDUCAT Home

EDUCAT Home

EDUCAT  January 2013

EDUCAT January 2013

Subject:

Re: Seeking input for upcoming ALCTS CAMMS talk

From:

Nerissa Lindsey <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Discussion List for issues related to cataloging & metadata education & training <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 4 Jan 2013 14:48:06 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (120 lines)

I agree with both Diane and Buzz,

I finished my MLIS at UW in 2010, and I've been working at a small branch
of the A&M system since then. I would say that the small amount of
'practical cataloging' covered in LIS 530 (I didn't take the advanced
cataloging course) wasted precious time, especially in the short ten week
period. When it came time to learn how to do MARC records it seemed like
most people either didn't get it, or if they did it wasn't enough coverage
to really be meaningful once they got a job. I learned most of my practical
cataloging skills working as a copy cataloger at UC Davis (back when Buzz
was still there : ) ) and through internships. I would say keeping the
focus on the theory, history and future in the LIS courses is sound advice.
I think it's great that you are highlighting the INFX courses, I wish I had
taken more than just the one needed to graduate. I am kicking myself for
not taking more than just INFX 542. I don't know if the iSchool  has
developed a specialization track for cataloging and metadata, but if they
are, most of those INFX courses should be required for graduating.

Diane is right about there not being many opportunities for continuing
education for people in traditional cataloging roles, and I know I will
become obsolete without updating my skills.  I am starting to take an open
course on databases from Stanford in two weeks, and I am going trough the
open course offerings of MIT to see if there are useful open courses for me
to take. For now it's the best I can do.

Good luck on your presentation Allyson, I wish I could be at ALA midwinter
to see it.

Best,

Nerissa Lindsey

Catalog Librarian

Killam Library

Texas A&M International University

Phone:956-326-2114

Email: [log in to unmask]


On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Allyson Carlyle <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Thanks Diane, this is great - and, I'm going to share it with my advanced
> cataloging students this term.
>
> Allyson (who is still working on how to approach her advanced cataloging
> class these days and has to decide by Sunday!!)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Discussion List for issues related to cataloging & metadata
> education & training [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Diane
> Hillmann
> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 9:10 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [eduCAT] Seeking input for upcoming ALCTS CAMMS talk
>
> Allyson, et al.:
>
> These are really important issues, and while not really daunted by the
> variety of opinion, I find myself most in agreement with Buzz's point of
> view, most likely because my teaching tends to be of the adjunct variety. I
> have to say that I think the practical stuff is overrated as appropriate
> content for a graduate level course. Yes, people want to be able to hit the
> ground running, but IMHO, those folks should be encouraged to work as a
> copy cataloger for a while or in conjunction with their coursework.
>
> What can't be learned on the job and IS appropriate for teaching at the
> master's level is 1) how cataloging as practiced both fits in and violates
> the theories of information organization; 2) how cataloging is changing and
> MUST change to be useful in the world we live in now; 3) what is metadata
> and how is it the same/different from cataloging.
>
> The people in programs working towards a master's degree today are very
> unlikely to be working in a cubicle surrounded by trucks of books and other
> materials with the job of fitting it all into an already existing catalog
> based on MARC and the shared cataloging of yesterday. If we train them for
> those jobs we are doing them a huge disservice, because it is unlikely that
> those jobs will be done by MLS librarians after the current crop retires.
> This is not to question the relevance of knowing about how current
> cataloging practice evolved, what problems it was designed to solve, and
> why those problems are no longer relevant--but it doesn't require knowing
> how to create a catalog record. If you don't think that cataloging
> experience can be both a help and a hindrance to understanding where our
> world is going, please take a look at Autocat and some of the other
> discussion lists packed with catalogers protesting the inexorable changes
> coming by insisting that the world still needs the kind of cataloging
> they've been doing for decades.
>
> If you're not convinced of this, take a look at the job ads that come out
> looking for cataloging and metadata librarians. These are the people who
> will manage change--and lots of it--in all kinds of libraries for as much
> of the near future that we can articulate. They will not be closely
> supervising hordes of professional catalogers, much less copy catalogers.
> Professional catalogers who are looking for help in making this leap are
> everywhere, and frankly, they're not getting the continuing education they
> need to manage the changes they're already seeing where they work. I see
> them in conferences and workshops, mostly, and few of them need convincing
> that they need help. I think it would be great if the library schools were
> looking more at meeting their needs as well, but so far I've seen little
> evidence of interest.
>
> I find it discouraging that so many of the justifications I see for
> continuing to teach the practicalities of cataloging come from students
> trying as best they can to articulate what they think they need. I'm not
> sure that was ever enough to build a useful curriculum, and it certainly
> isn't now. I'm sure I'll make many on this list uncomfortable by saying
> that in my opinion, most library school (or iSchool, if you prefer) faculty
> that I've met are not able to adequately prepare their students for these
> changes because their own learning and experience has not kept up. I'd like
> to see that change, but nothing I've suggested so far has taken hold.
>
> Time to take a few deep breaths and get back to work ...
>
> Diane Hillmann
> "For many years a cataloger, but now a professional troublemaker"
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2020
July 2020
June 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
March 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
June 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
December 2007
November 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
April 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager