Bobby Bothmann wrote:
> Page 8, 246 Monographs column "Use indicators: 31"
> What is the rationale for this? Not that any OPAC really seems to do this,
> but 1 for "Note, Added Entry" would make more sense as it would use the
> second indicator to let us know what kind of varying form of title it
> actually is.
I think that the idea here is that because the 245 $b for parallel title is mandatory if applicable, then having a note generated from the 246 is pure redundancy. First indicator "1" would only be appropriate when the parallel title is not also given in the 245 field.
Kevin M. Randall
Principal Serials Cataloger
Northwestern University Library
[log in to unmask]
Proudly wearing the sensible shoes since 1978!