Has anyone else had a problem responding? I got near what I think might be one of the last questions (don't remember which), clicked "Next," and nothing happened. Repeated clicks on "Next" brought no progress or response. So I finally abandoned it, although I've saved it in hopes of completing a reply. But this computer is occasionally cranky, and I am a computer-hopeless case.
From: Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]>
To: ARSCLIST <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Mon, Feb 4, 2013 12:25 pm
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] ARSC Survey?
Nathan Georgitis is the new ARSC Executive Director, and this is legit.
Mike Biel [log in to unmask]
-------- Original Message --------
From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
> Mal, It's the real deal; I just took it. Uncle Dave
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Malcolm Rockwell
<[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>> I just received what could be a nasty slice of spam. It concerns an ARSC
>> survey, but does not come from ARSC. Here is the gist of it:
> *ARSC is conducting an important survey of its membership and we are eager
> to hear from you!*
> As part of the *ARSC 2.0* initiative, David Giovannoni and Tim Brooks have
> designed this survey to learn about you and your thoughts about ARSC.
> Please be thoughtful and honest in your answers. They will guide the board
> as it evaluates ARSC's priorities and future directions.
> *Your participation is critical.* You can take the survey any time, day or
> night, through March 4th. It should take only ten minutes of your time.
> Click here to begin: xxxxxxxxxx
> Is it humbug?