LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME Archives

BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME  February 2013

BIBFRAME February 2013

Subject:

Re: LC's BIBFRAME vocabulary & books in 008

From:

Remote Cataloguer <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 6 Feb 2013 08:44:24 +1000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (136 lines)

Good on you Reinhold- I've long thought that "books" needs an 008 position
Best regards
Nan


Nan Sweetser BA(LIS) CSturt, AALIA
Cataloguer
The Book House
11/3 Traders Lane,
Noosaville QLD 4566
T. 07 5449 9611
F. 07 5474 4677
[log in to unmask]



This email, together with any attachments, is intended for the named recipient(s) only. Any form of review, disclosure, modification, distribution and or publication of this email message is prohibited without the express permission of the author. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete it from your system. Unless otherwise stated, this email represents only the views of the sender and not the views of The Book House.



-----Original Message-----
From: Heuvelmann, Reinhold [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 11:03 PM
Subject: AW: Re: [BIBFRAME] LC's BIBFRAME vocabulary

Karen and all,

> Or maybe it would be more amusing to see who could come
> up with the most unusual, but necessary, bibliographic subtype.

maybe the Festschrift indicator, i.e. field 008 for Books, position 30 (and mirrored in field 006 position 13), is a good candidate?

http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd008b.html
and
http://metadataregistry.org/schemaprop/show/id/2544.html

Best wishes

Reinhold

--

Reinhold Heuvelmann
German National Library
IT / Office for Data Formats
Adickesallee 1
D-60322 Frankfurt am Main
Germany
Telephone: +49-69-1525-1709
Telefax: +49-69-1525-1799
mailto:[log in to unmask]
http://www.dnb.de

*** Reading. Listening. Understanding. German National Library ***



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Im Auftrag von Karen Coyle
Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Januar 2013 17:32
An: [log in to unmask]
Betreff: Re: [BIBFRAME] LC's BIBFRAME vocabulary

Nate, that is what I assumed, and thanks for confirming that. I still 
think we might find some "office pools" arising on likely next 
candidates . Or maybe it would be more amusing to see who could come up 
with the most unusual, but necessary, bibliographic subtype. There are 
catalogers who have seen things that most of us couldn't even imagine. 
If ever there was a "cataloger cocktail party" this would be a great 
game for it.

kc

On 1/29/13 6:45 AM, Trail, Nate wrote:
> Karen, we're just getting started defining subtypes; Dissertation was just the first one we started trying to model, realizing that it had properties not likely to belong to any other "type" of Work.  We can  see that there may be lots of them, but agreeing on them will take some work.
>
> Nate
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Nate Trail
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Network Development and MARC  Standards Office
> Technology Policy Mail stop 4402
> Library Services
> Library of Congress
> 202-707-2193
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Karen Coyle
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 9:24 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [BIBFRAME] LC's BIBFRAME vocabulary
>
> The dissertation type is interesting, thanks, Jason. It basically takes what WAS a note that essentially changed the meaning of the entire record and makes dissertation a type of resource. [1] That is great to see. I note that there are two "sub-types" under Work [2]: dissertation and cartographic. I would have bet that music would end up there, but it isn't. Not to mention serials and seriality. We can take bets on which types move out of Work and become subtypes :-). And I can see what you mean about scaling.
>
> kc
>
> [1] I also was wrong about their not being a fixed field: there is a code for theses. I believe the difficulty in my institution was that the code was filled in less often than the note was created. Probably not uncommon.
> [2] http://bibframe.org/vocab/Work.html (scroll to bottom)
>
> On 1/28/13 10:37 AM, Jason Ronallo wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> As an example, one field that I would greatly miss is the 502
>>> Dissertation Note. Unless things have changed since I was still
>>> processing MARC records, the presence of this note is the only way to
>>> know that what you have is a dissertation. Obviously folks in
>>> academic libraries would want to be able to limit some searches to
>>> dissertations. (I'd be happy for "dissertation" to be a value
>>> somewhere in the future record -- although we'd still need the
>>> information that is in the note, and it might need some special
>>> treatment.)
>> It appears that Dissertation will be handled through its own type:
>> http://bibframe.org/vocab/Dissertation.html
>> Is this a pattern which is likely to repeat? I wonder if this approach
>> will run into some of the same scaling issues of Schema.org and
>> require some sort of external enumeration or additionalType property
>> to accommodate all the different types of things collected.
>>
>> Jason
> --
> Karen Coyle
> [log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
> ph: 1-510-540-7596
> m: 1-510-435-8234
> skype: kcoylenet

-- 
Karen Coyle
[log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager