I don't think publication plays any role in the naming of works.  If the 
published manifestation's title is the better known of the two though, the 
work could be named using it instead of the original dissertation title.

Adam

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Adam L. Schiff
Principal Cataloger
University of Washington Libraries
Box 352900
Seattle, WA 98195-2900
(206) 543-8409
(206) 685-8782 fax
[log in to unmask]
http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

On Fri, 1 Feb 2013, D. Brooking wrote:

> So whether the dissertation was "published" doesn't make a difference? (I am 
> assuming I guess it was a print dissertation anyway, since if it's online, it 
> is published).
>
>
>
>
> ************
> Diana Brooking             (206) 685-0389
> Cataloging Librarian       (206) 685-8782 fax
> Suzzallo Library           [log in to unmask]
> University of Washington
> Box 352900
> Seattle WA  98195-2900
>
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2013, Adam L. Schiff wrote:
>
>> I think if the text is the same, i.e. that the published book is just a 
>> different manifestation, then the original title would be recorded in 240, 
>> as was done.  If the dissertation represents a new expression, then 
>> according to RDA practice you would use a 240 for the original title rather 
>> than the old practice of using a 700 author/title related work added entry. 
>> This is covered in the NACO RDA training on expressions. Technically the 
>> 240 is not completely correct according to RDA, because with a new 
>> expression you should not just have the title of the original work, but 
>> LC's practice is not to specifically name expressions in a case such as 
>> this.
>> 
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> Adam L. Schiff
>> Principal Cataloger
>> University of Washington Libraries
>> Box 352900
>> Seattle, WA 98195-2900
>> (206) 543-8409
>> (206) 685-8782 fax
>> [log in to unmask]
>> http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> 
>> On Fri, 1 Feb 2013, Byrd, Jacqueline Jo wrote:
>> 
>>> OCLC has a PCC record for the published version of a dissertation.  The 
>>> record has a 240 with the title of a dissertation, and a 245 with the 
>>> published title.  Does this sound right?  I thought maybe using a 700 
>>> field with a $i for the author/title of the dissertation might be better. 
>>> I've never seen this approach before and would like some advice.
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> Jacqueline Byrd
>>> Head, Area Studies Cataloging Section
>>> Technical Services Department
>>> Herman B Wells Library
>>> Indiana University
>>> 1320 E. 10th St.
>>> Bloomington, IN 47405
>>> TEL: 812-855-4310
>>> FAX: 812-855-7933
>>> [log in to unmask]
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>