Related to this, what is the preferred way to handle 378 when the
fuller form that would be used in a qualifier differs from the fullest
known form? For example (hypothetically), "Smith, R." (based on
preferred name) is known to be "Rowena Lydia Smith." "Smith. R. $q
(Rowena)" resolves any known conflicts with other authorized access
points and becomes the 100.  What should the 378 be: "$q Rowena" or
"$q Rowena Lydia" or should there be 378s for both (the field is
repeatable)? If improbably "Smith, R." had no conflicts, what would be
the preferred 378 practice?

Stephen


>
> Having the data in 378q of a NAR should suffice for most purposes, am I
> right?
>
>
>
> - Ian
>
>
>
> Ian Fairclough - George Mason University - [log in to unmask]



-- 
Stephen Hearn, Metadata Strategist
Technical Services, University Libraries
University of Minnesota
160 Wilson Library
309 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
Ph: 612-625-2328
Fx: 612-625-3428