LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PCCLIST Archives


PCCLIST Archives

PCCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PCCLIST Home

PCCLIST Home

PCCLIST  February 2013

PCCLIST February 2013

Subject:

Re: Order of subfields in RDA NARs for personal names

From:

Stephen Hearn <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:25:19 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (400 lines)

Not all other changes. RDA is imposing new rules for $c data, new
rules for expressing dates (no more b., d., ca. ...), new rules for
uniform titles ($k Selections before $l [language], spelling out
arr.), etc., and those will impose lots of changes on existing
headings.  Many will be in the 400K LCNAF revisions coming in the next
month or so.

Stephen

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Stanley Elswick - NOAA Federal
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Paul,
>
> I am glad you reiterated that principle.  I have seen a lot of headings
> change over the past few years that did not require a change to make them
> unique or to fix an error.
>
> We can still add a death date to an existing heading, but all other changes
> to a heading without an error or conflict with another heading should not be
> made, right?
>
> Stanley
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Frank, Paul <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Richard,
>>
>>
>>
>> It is actually a long-standing NACO Program guideline that is still
>> applicable in the RDA transition period:
>>
>>
>>
>> Unless there is a clear error in a 1XX, leave the 1XX alone to minimize
>> the amount of bibliographic file maintenance in library catalogs.
>>
>>
>>
>> The scope of 1XX "errors" is wider now because of RDA instructions, but
>> the basic NACO Program guideline to avoid 1XX changes if at all possible
>> remains the same.
>>
>>
>>
>> So, a couple of examples of "leave the 1XX alone" at the time of re-coding
>> to RDA:
>>
>>
>>
>> 1) AACR2 heading without a birth date, but the date was subsequently
>> discovered (e.g., recorded in a 670)  :  accept the heading as RDA -- do not
>> add that birth date to the 1XX. (You could add the date(s) to the 046 field
>> however);
>>
>>
>>
>> 2) AACR2 heading with a fuller form of name in $q that would not be
>> required under RDA (no conflict) : accept the heading as RDA -- leave the
>> subfield $q in the 1XX.
>>
>>
>>
>> About the 50 Cent $c (Musician) record (no2003002159):
>>
>>
>>
>> The AACR2 1XX was 50 Cent ǂc (Musician) at the time Chuck (or someone else
>> at Carnegie) established the heading on Jan. 9, 2003.
>>
>>
>>
>> Based on the NACO guideline to leave the 1XX alone unless it is incorrect,
>> and on RDA 9.2.2.21 and RDA 9.19.1.2, the AACR2 1XX 50 Cent ǂc (Musician) is
>> acceptable under RDA, and no 1XX change is necessary at the time of the
>> re-coding.
>>
>>
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>
>> Paul Frank
>>
>> Cooperative Programs Section
>>
>> Cooperative and Instructional Programs Division
>>
>> Library of Congress
>>
>> 101 Independence Ave., SE
>>
>> Washington, DC 20540-4230
>>
>> 202-707-1570
>>
>> [log in to unmask]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> On Behalf Of Moore, Richard
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 2:06 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Order of subfields in RDA NARs for personal names
>>
>>
>>
>> It would. I'm sure there is an LC guideline that says 1XX should not be
>> altered in RDA review, if the construction is acceptable in RDA. So neither
>> should the qualifier be changed, nor a date be added. perhaps Paul can
>> confirm, as I can't lay my hands on the link at this moment (it's 7 a.m.
>> here and I have not yet had my first cup of tea).
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>>
>> _________________________
>>
>> Richard Moore
>>
>> Authority Control Team Manager
>>
>> The British Library
>>
>>
>>
>> Tel.: +44 (0)1937 546806
>>
>> E-mail: [log in to unmask]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> On Behalf Of John Hostage
>> Sent: 19 February 2013 21:17
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Order of subfields in RDA NARs for personal names
>>
>> Wouldn’t the heading for 50 Cent be considered RDA “acceptable” as is?
>> Moreover, in today’s multicultural world, it’s getting harder and harder to
>> say what does or does not convey the idea of a person.
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------
>>
>> John Hostage
>>
>> Authorities and Database Integrity Librarian
>>
>> Harvard Library--Information and Technical Services
>>
>> Langdell Hall 194
>>
>> Cambridge, MA 02138
>>
>> [log in to unmask]
>>
>> +(1)(617) 495-3974 (voice)
>>
>> +(1)(617) 496-4409 (fax)
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> On Behalf Of Herrold, Charles
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 15:14
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Order of subfields in RDA NARs for personal names
>>
>>
>>
>>     This should have been qualified with (Rapper or Rap musician) to begin
>> with.  (It’s my record, so I can say what I want about it!)  However, if he
>> can now be considered “entrepreneur, investor and actor” as well, then my
>> third alternative below is probably the best one. The first version of the
>> AR looked like this:
>>
>>
>>
>> 010  no2003002159
>>
>> 040  PPi-MA ǂb eng ǂc PPi-MA
>>
>> 1000 50 Cent ǂc (Musician)
>>
>> 4000 Fifty Cent ǂc (Musician)
>>
>> 4001 Jackson, C. ǂq (Curtis)
>>
>> 4001 Jackson, Curtis
>>
>> 670  Music from and inspired by the motion picture 8 mile [SR] p2002: ǂb
>> container (50 Cent) insert (C. Jackson)
>>
>> 670  All music guide WWW site, Jan. 8, 2003 ǂb (50 Cent; b. Curtis
>> Jackson, Queens, NY; rapper)
>>
>> 670  OCLC database, Jan. 8, 2003 ǂb (hdgs.: 50 Cent (Musician); 50 Cent,
>> rapper)
>>
>>
>>
>>      More worrisome is what to do in upgrading this to RDA.  There are
>> almost too many possibilities:
>>
>>
>>
>> 50 Cent ǂc (Rapper)
>>
>> 50 Cent ǂc (Rapper), ǂd 1975-
>>
>> 50 Cent, ǂd 1975-
>>
>>
>>
>>      I think we’ve established, mainly though Richard Moore’s thoughtful
>> statements, that $c would precede $d.  But the question remains: with a
>> birth date clearly identifying “50 Cent” as a person, is the additional of
>> Occupation even necessary:
>>
>>
>>
>> 010  no 00088820
>>
>> 040  RPB-M ǂb eng ǂc RPB-M ǂd PPi-MA ǂd DLC ǂe rda ǂd ICrlF
>>
>> 046  ǂf 1971
>>
>> 1000 Chali 2na, ǂd 1971-
>>
>> 372  Music industry
>>
>> 373  Jurassic 5
>>
>> 374  Rapper
>>
>> 375  male
>>
>> 377  eng
>>
>> 4000 Chali2na, ǂd 1971-
>>
>> 4001 2na, Chali
>>
>> 4000 Chali2na ǂc (Musician)
>>
>> 4001 Stewart, Charles, ǂd 1971-
>>
>> 4001 Tuna, Charlie
>>
>> 4000 Chali 2na ǂc (Musician) ǂw nnea
>>
>>
>>
>> I haven’t been consistent myself.  I’d like to be, going forward at least.
>>
>>
>>
>> Chuck Herrold
>>
>> Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Carolyn S
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 11:23 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Order of subfields in RDA NARs for personal names
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Should 50 Cent be qualified by (Rapper) rather than by (Musician)?
>> Wikipedia lists 50 Cent as being a rapper, entrepreneur, investor and actor.
>> (My staff have been debating this for the last 15 minutes.)
>>
>>
>>
>> Are these qualifications up for discussion?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Carolyn Gonzalez
>>
>> Head of Technical Services
>>
>> Sueltenfuss Library
>>
>> Our Lady of the Lake University
>>
>> 411 SW 24th St
>>
>> San Antonio, TX  78249
>>
>>
>>
>> (210) 434-6711 x8165
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> On Behalf Of Mark K. Ehlert
>> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 9:21 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Order of subfields in RDA NARs for personal names
>>
>>
>>
>> Herrold, Charles <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>    I’ve done one somewhat like this—not very tidy—and perhaps incorrectly:
>>
>>
>>
>> 1000 KJ-52 ǂc (Rapper), ǂd 1975-  [changed from KJ52 (Rapper)]
>>
>>
>> A question on this point came up during our RDA in NACO training in
>> November.  Here's the question I posed to Paul Frank along with his
>> response:
>>
>> 5. Additions made to names that do not evoke "person-ness": since LC-PCC
>> PS 9.19.1.3 asks for birth/death dates in personal name access points
>> regardless of conflict, it seems this is also expected for those names that
>> require Profession/Occupation element data to clarify the person-ness of
>> someone (RDA 9.19.1.2).  Following this, we would then have:
>>
>>  100 0- 50 Cent $c (Musician), $d 1975-
>>
>> Is this correct?
>>
>> PF: Yes, this is correct.
>>
>> --
>> Mark K. Ehlert                 Minitex
>> Coordinator                    University of Minnesota
>> Digitization, Cataloging &     15 Andersen Library
>>   Metadata Education (DCME)    222 21st Avenue South
>> Phone: 612-624-0805            Minneapolis, MN 55455-0439
>> <http://www.minitex.umn.edu/>
>>
>> This email message and any files transmitted with it are intended only for
>> the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
>> information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure
>> under applicable law.� Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by
>> anyone other than the intended individual or entity is prohibited without
>> prior approval.� If you have received this information in error, please
>> notify the sender immediately.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Stanley Elswick
> NOAA Central Library
> 301.713.2607 x138
>
> The content of this msg., unless stated explicity otherwise, reflects only
> my personal views and not the views of the U.S. Government.



-- 
Stephen Hearn, Metadata Strategist
Technical Services, University Libraries
University of Minnesota
160 Wilson Library
309 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
Ph: 612-625-2328
Fx: 612-625-3428

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager