You have it easy.
We will need to support all the variations, mappings...
Sent from my iPad
On Mar 13, 2013, at 18:48, "Tom Emerson" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Michael Hopwood writes:
>> 1) Your own vocabulary (even if it is substantially made up of re-used
>> terms, it still has its own identity)
>> 2) Mappings to others' vocabularies
> At which point I don't feel like the community is any better off than we
> are now, where each major library has its own tweaks to MARC that
> consumers need to deal with. We're trading one thing for another. This
> is especially true once you start account for international records.
> Tom Emerson
> Principal Software Engineer, Search
> EBSCO Publishing
> [log in to unmask]