LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME Archives

BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME  May 2013

BIBFRAME May 2013

Subject:

Re: Consistency

From:

Hal Cain <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 30 May 2013 00:47:58 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (47 lines)

On Wed, 29 May 2013 18:58:40 +0000, Tennant,Roy <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>On 5/29/13 5/29/13 � 9:35 AM, "J. McRee Elrod" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>>What consistency? We have in our database "il.", "ill.", and now
>>"illustrations". To my shock, I found "illus." in a few derived
>>records, which so far as I know was never a standard.
>
>Yeah, well, whatever.
><http://experimental.worldcat.org/marcusage/2013-04-300b.txt>
>Roy
>========================================================================

Yeah, well, whatever.

To make that extract more useful, Roy, may I suggest you first select for
the language of cataloguing (viz. English, coded eng). Then sort by the
cataloguing code/format.

Then it would be quite possible to reduce the apparent wilderness to a few
patterns, even to create a means of standardizing the vast majority.

Codes have differed in their specifications for such data: it would be more
useful to know how much variation there is between records created (or
revised) under the principal codes, and whether machine manipulation of the
data could reduce the variations to 50%, 90% or 99% without significant loss
of information.

It might also be useful to see the data over spans of years according to the
cataloguing codes chiefly in force.

Non-English codes will be a different matter to correlate. Anything outside
a standard formula will be harder to handle, but if WorldCat management is
serious about its international scope, that too will have to be addressed --
and coding seems to be the obvious tool.

Until maybe a decade ago, most of us were cataloguing for the benefit of the
human eye (of the reader); now we're expected to catalogue for the machine
(while still yielding results interpretable by the human eye). It's hardly
fair (as you seemed to imply, but maybe I'm wrong there) to complain that
results of our past work now don't suit the machine and the algorithms it
applies.

Hal Cain
Melbourne, Australia
[log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager