Ross Singer posted:

>The argument for using numeric/letter codes to define the data model is a
>canard, frankly.
 

Ummm; 130 and 240 are convenient short hand for "uniform title as
main entry" and "uniform title after main entry for filing".

What <bf:term> has been created for these two elements? There seems to
me to be a tension between being short enough for ease, or being long
enough to be explicit. Some of the RDA 336 content terms and $e
relationship terms are far too long. I hope that will not be true of
Bibframe element names.


   __ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([log in to unmask])
  {__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
  ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________





 
 7