On Thu, 16 May 2013 18:20:46 -0700, J. McRee Elrod <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>I gather that Bibframe "works" are RDA works and
>expressions. If each translation is its own work, with its own record
>(or whatever it is decided to call the work data), then shouldn't the
>various translations be related? Will Bibframe have an equivalent of
Maybe the relationship is simply hierarchical: each such translation has the
same relationship to the source work?
If it's easy to follow that relationship path, then any other linking
mechanism is superfluous.
[log in to unmask]