On 09/05/13 05:33, Tim Cole wrote:
> Perhaps it's overly pedantic for BIBFRAME purposes or explicitly excluded by
> BIBFRAME use cases, but in RDF generically the use of
> http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1809-1062 as the identifier for Stuart Yates the
> individual creates the potential for ambiguity since this same identifier is
> also the identifier of an HTML Web page (i.e., the ORCID Web server returns
> an HTML file and status 200 when the URI is de-referenced, at least for some
A point well made.
I had made the assumption that the ubiquity of this ambiguity in extant
library data was why we were using bf:uri rather than rdf:ID.
Library Technology Services http://www.victoria.ac.nz/library/