LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  July 2013

ARSCLIST July 2013

Subject:

Re: The end of Windows XP? So What !!!

From:

Roderic G Stephens <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Roderic G Stephens <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 17 Jul 2013 13:57:17 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (147 lines)

Hey, maybe I should get my old KayPro cp/m based computer out of the garage.  Or, restore my Win98 that I've got sitting on an old drive.  They can't stop me now!


________________________________
 From: Carl Pultz <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] The end of Windows XP?  So What !!!
 

Tom, no sense shaking your fist! :) Yeah, I made all those steps, starting
with OS2. No, starting with DOS. XP is a great system, and as somebody
suggested in this thread, enough push-back may convince MS to extend
support. Didn't that happen once before? The install base is enormous.

Not to make like an IT analyst here - not one - but it has worked out that
Microsoft OSes that were meant for home hobby users got taken up by business
almost immediately. I mean Windows 95 once it got proper networking. IBMers
in the North East were mostly using 98 by the time OS2 died out (that in
part because all the customers were using Windows). This ginormous company
was willing to pay MS for the honor of abandoning their own invention. Our
site was kind of an outlier, and we went from OS2 to NT - a much better
product than 98, but not as plug&play, so more support-intensive. But, when
we were folded into the bigger corporate structure, we downgraded users to
98! It was what corp IT was supporting. The point is it was good enough and
universal enough that it was better. After NT, MS must have reasoned that
there was no point in making different amateur and professional operating
systems, and focused on one platform to serve them all, with small changes
in emphasis and intentional limitations to differentiate the products. I
guess it didn't make sense to offer a business desktop without the frills.

And, yes, IT is a cost to business. In the late 90s to early 00s, as the
reliability of new hardware rapidly increased and cost decreased, the cost
of maintaining the staff to maintain the older machines grew higher than the
cost of new HW. That better HW is part of what drove advances in OS, a
symbiotic deal. Platforms were rapidly turned over, and I was soon turned
out. Me and 14,000 other redundancies that day. It's a dog's life in the IT
world.

I love the idea of old stuff remaining useful. But the question of
newer/better is an individual thing. If I had a buck for every hour I've
spent attempting to rescue data off a friend's old machine that was "working
fine just last week," I could buy a MAC.

Now, indulge me a minute to consider the question of cost. Thirty years ago,
in pro audio, we spent at least $1000 to buy just about anything that was
important, and that's worth about $2700 today. That thing might have worked
for 30 plus years and still be useful now. But it did only one thing. One
thing. The low cost of PCs and OSes, matched with their stupendous utility,
have spoiled us into a skewed sense of value about everything. Obviously,
the powers in Vermont should just buy Andy a whole new studio rather than
wasting his time on half-measures like this. Can I get a witness?

-----Original Message-----
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tom Fine
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 11:44 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] The end of Windows XP? So What !!!

Hi Carl:

For most corporate everyday tasks, there was enough user interface and
computing power back with Windows 2000 (an update of WinNT that brought the
user interface in line with Win98, and improved many things). Most of that
power was brought into WinXP for home users, and XP Pro continued the
improvements for corporate users. So for most of us, there is no reason
except forced obsolesence to "upgrade" any further. In my opinion, only
someone with more money than brains runs out and gets every "upgrade." There
is now a long history of lardware, "feature-creep" and ill-conceived
"reinvent the wheel" disasters (like Windows 8, for instance). If something
works well, the wise man sticks with it until he's absolutely sure that
something better has finally come down the pike. 
Newer <> better.

In a business setting, IT budgets are basically massive cost centers unless
they are directly improving productivity and allowing machines to take over
work done by people. So, needless "upgrades" and needless hours wasted
re-training people on new software direct impacts the bottom line. In small
businesses like mine, it's money directly out of my pocket, twice (once to
buy the un-needed "upgrade" and once to use non-billable hours trying to
figure it out).

BTW, I didn't switch to XP until it was up to SP3. Win2K was serving my
needs just fine. By SP3, XP was clearly a superior operating environment and
could be tuned to look and act almost exactly like Win2K with some
ease-of-use improvements.

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message -----
From: "Carl Pultz" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] The end of Windows XP? So What !!!


> It's surprising how much mission critical corporate infrastructure runs on
> old platforms. When I was a tech at an IBM data center ten years ago,
there
> was tons of old junk running monitoring and disaster-recovery systems for
> big corps, with whining hard drives and irreplaceable hardware - disasters
> waiting to happen. I was amazed at the willingness of managers to roll the
> dice at that level with that much wealth on the line. I doubt that has
> changed, though older PC gear is much more capable now than what was old
> then.
>
> Anyway, for small shops it is reasonable to run old stuff isolated so long
> as you don't create more hassle with that than the effort of upgrades.
Keep
> a close eye on the HW and the 'restorablility' of your old box. Keep
system
> images, compatible maintenance utilities, and spare parts on hand. If you
> are only going to play in your own sandbox, that's fine. If you need
skills
> that are portable, or you need to interoperate with other environments or
> people who have moved on, then it's good to stay conversant with newer
> formats, interfaces, and standards. Unlike tape machines, there isn't
> usually anything endearingly better about older computer gear, and
upgrades
> are deductible business expenses.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dan Nelson
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 11:59 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] The end of Windows XP? So What !!!
>
> So what if MS  stops security updates for  XP.....
> I have xp pro running on all of my stand alone audio work stations...
none
> of them are on line !
> Just like 10's of thousand corporate computers are running XP  isolated
from
> the internet as long as XP runs the existing internal programs MS dropping
> support doesnt matter.
> My work stations are running Intel I3 with 8 gigs of ram .... more than xp
> knows what to do with  but they run 12-18 hours a day and never blink.
> Just run XP off line and  save the hassel of  finding replacement programs
.
> dnward
> Beautiful Music you will never forget, at;
> http://www.americanbeautiful.podbean.com/
>
> 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager