LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  July 2013

ARSCLIST July 2013

Subject:

Re: Folk Music in America

From:

Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 3 Jul 2013 21:01:20 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (139 lines)

RIP The Nightbird. I used to love her show when I could make myself stay awake long enough to hear 
it. A few times, I caught the tail end of it as I crept in after a long night out.

She used to play "The War of the Worlds" OTR broadcast every Halloween she was on the air.

For a few years that happened to be my formative years, WNEW-FM was the ultimate FM rock station. I 
got turned on to a lot of music I still like today. The only thing that's come close in the current 
age is, surprisingly, Pandora. I "trained" it relentlessly to "understand" my tastes when I first 
installed it and now it regularly comes up with interesting soul, funk and jazz tunes that are 
unknown or little-known to me, particularly stuff of recent vintage.

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ward Duffield" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 8:11 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Folk Music in America


> Well, Thank God I could fall asleep to Alison Steele, the Nightbird on WNEW-FM!!
>
> Ward NY
>> Hi Carl,
>>
>> It's OK to raise fists and bay at the moon, but that won't change the moon. Antitrust laws have 
>> been gutted since the 90s, so megaglomeration of ... everything is inevitable.
>>
>> As far as the FM broadcasting industry, I think you're looking back fondly with very rosy 
>> glasses. The FM band is NOT a reliable "security" asset due to limited range and sometimes fussy 
>> transmitting and receiving gear. It never was some haven of profitability, in fact there was a 
>> very short window in time where a few album-oriented rock stations and, even more so, a few 
>> formula-automated easy listening stations were mega cash machines. So of course the first- and 
>> second-generation owners were all too happy to sell to CC and Evergreen and others. The FCC had 
>> no business allowing ANY owner to have multiple frequencies in any market, but as I said there 
>> was a change in antitrust laws following the end of the Cold War ("Global Marketplace" and all, 
>> ya know). CC and its like got theirs anyway because it turns out that if you put 5 copies of the 
>> same lame formula in a marketplace, none of them get listened to. I've noticed that an FM 
>> frequency has become so value-less for music broadcasting that religious talk-radio and even 
>> poltical talk-radio have started to pop up on the FM dial all over the place. Sports radio moved 
>> over there several years ago.
>>
>> As far as "culturally relevant" (as decided by whom???) radio, the FM band was sabotaged by 
>> tax-subsidized NPR. What commercial station wants to try and fight that? So in many markets, the 
>> "higher brow taste" model was completely surrendered to the NPR empire. In my opinion, they do a 
>> mostly middling job, although the technical quality evolved from amateurish in the early days to 
>> superb in many cases today. As far as content, by being obsessed with political correctness, 
>> "inclusiveness" of every oddball "viewpoint" and trying to do anything they can think of "not of 
>> the masses," they alienate large swaths of the market (and one day will pay in the loss of their 
>> tax subsidy). I say this even though I listen to NPR far more than any other radio content, it is 
>> nearly 100% of my over-air listening because everything else is so terrible. I also note that NPR 
>> worked very hard to kill low-power Community FM, which would have been a blessing of true 
>> democratic (SMALL d) variety everywhere it flourished (Community FM was one of the few good ideas 
>> to come out of the FCC in the past few decades, and it was killed by massive pressure from the 
>> CC's of the world joined by NPR biting the hand that feeds it).
>>
>> FM radio was already heading down the tubes when I was in high school in the early 80s. I was 
>> complaining about the lack of variety among the several differently-owned rock stations I could 
>> easily pick up in the NYC suburbs. One of my friends joined in the lament and said, "hey man, the 
>> best radio station on the planet is your turntable." He was so right! I'm very glad I always 
>> invested in records, CDs and tape recorders rather than tuners.
>>
>> An interesting discussion is, should radio have been left alone much more so from the get-go, 
>> with the FCC in place only to monitor modulation levels and frequency (technical stuff). The only 
>> caveat I would have put in place from Day 1 would be -- only one frequency per market per owner, 
>> and strictly enforced that every step of the way. From there, let public taste and market 
>> economics decide what's popular, what formats work and what's profitable. Stay out of the way and 
>> let the folks run their own entertainment tastes. Under my system, you're potentially giving Joe 
>> Blow who bought a frequency cheap after WWII the same chance to be "Must Hear Radio" as NBC or 
>> CBS networks, as long as Joe Blow knew his market and could deliver something the big boys 
>> weren't.
>>
>> -- Tom Fine
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Carl Pultz" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 10:23 PM
>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Folk Music in America
>>
>>
>>> Airwaves do matter. No wish to be argumentative, just that radio has played a big role in my 
>>> life, so it's important to me to question this common wisdom. There are a lot of people who 
>>> still 'use' radio for music and more who would if offered a better product. Many depend on the 
>>> old delivery system and, given the anti-competiveness of broadband providers and the high cost 
>>> of wireless, many will for a long time. It's just that to the press, radio is old tech, and 
>>> therefore over. And, crucially, this blaming of the customer is perfect cover for the 
>>> rapaciousness and incompetence of the captains of the industry. Let me share a relevant story...
>>>
>>> ...It was already 50,000 watts hot on that September morning in 'Vegas, but coolness prevailed 
>>> at the yearly Captains of Radio confab [NAB, or something like that]. Most were phat. And, if 
>>> not happy, were keeping their misgivings to themselves. By eleven, at least one cigar chomper 
>>> was already getting restless and starting to picture the leggy servers waiting for him at the 
>>> Pharaoh Room pig roast. Almost there, sweaty palms. Just gotta live through the droning of the 
>>> stat man. A wafer-thin bowtie wearing an Adams Apple approached the mic. He'd left his cool back 
>>> home...
>>>
>>> This was about 10 or more years ago, when Clear Channel had pretty much finished its feeding 
>>> frenzy, but had yet to begin its decade of nausea. The speaker was, IIRC, the VP of Research for 
>>> Sinclair Broadcasting, or one of the other large ownership chains, newly dwarfed by CC. Somebody 
>>> to listen to, and with a serious message. The industry faced a risk, he told them, as 
>>> consolidation and centralized programming eliminate an important source of information that 
>>> music formats had lived by for years. Trends, tastes, styles are local and regional in their 
>>> development, often arising where least expected. Who in New York anticipated Nashville, or 
>>> Memphis, or Detroit, or Seattle, or Greensborough? Or any of that highly-profitable noise the 
>>> kids dream up? By losing the intelligence developed by local radio, the industry will be blinded 
>>> to the emergence of new talent and sounds, unable to exploit them. This can undermine the 
>>> relevance of radio to a whole generation. Meanwhile, the medium could face serious challenge 
>>> from new gadgets just as its audience steadily ages. This will hurt the performance not only of 
>>> radio, but effect its traditional role in supporting the eco-system of the music business as a 
>>> whole, concerts and recording.
>>>
>>> Looking back on it, there couldn't have been a suit in the room who wasn't aware of the 
>>> implication of CC's binge of leverage. Properties would be gutted, programming nationalized. 
>>> They knew, because they had done it, setting this devolution in motion. But here was a 
>>> monoculture like never before, with the power to ruin the whole game. Mr. Sliderule just told 
>>> them of their end. Please, Clear Channel, gobble up one more. And let it be mine.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On 
>>> Behalf Of Tom Fine
>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 2:10 PM
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Folk Music in America
>>>
>>> My bet is, the cycle will come around and the airwaves will matter. Perhaps not for broadcasting
>>> music, but the owners of the frequencies will get the last laugh.
>>>
>>> What I can't understand is, given that we live in the age of streaming music, iPods, YouTube,
>>> Pandora, etc -- who CARES what's on the FM dial???
>>>
>>> -- Tom Fine
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager