LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  July 2013

ARSCLIST July 2013

Subject:

Re: Need helping identifying a reel to reel deck

From:

Shai Drori <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 4 Jul 2013 08:24:27 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (47 lines)

I still remember my parents' old reliable Dual SK1009. It's not on par 
with my EMT but I still listen to the records that they played on it and 
they are fine.
Shai
בתאריך 04/07/13 4:23 AM, ציטוט Donald Clarke:
> Hey, what about the free market? All those record changers were manufactured becauae people wanted them!
>
> Donald
>
> On Jul 3, 2013, at 7:46 PM, Tom Fine wrote:
>
> Regarding the record-wreckers pictured here:
> http://midimagic.sgc-hosting.com/changerx.htm
>
> ARE YOU KIDDING??? No sane person would play a record of any value to them or anyone else on these junkers!
>
> There is NO good way to drop records on top of each other! There is NO good "changer" that mechanically cues the stylus to the groove and there is NO tonearm pictured that can comfortably track at a non-destructable weight of 1.5g or less. Put them in the same cabinet as woofers, listen at reasonable volume in a reasonable sized room, and any light-tracking cartridge will pop out of the groove, despite the primative squishy springs semi-"isolating" the turntable platters (which are mostly pictured as resonant metal with thin ancient felt strips covering them). These things all come up against basic physics, so they are doomed from the get-go.
>
> Enjoy your "antiques" (JUNK to some) but don't get these groove-chewers anywhere near any of my records!
>
> Now, as to the tuners and speakers and amplifiers in some of the better antique consoles, there was some very fine engineering and manufacturing. I cite specifically the Ampex super-expensive consoles sold in the early 60's through outlets like Neiman-Marcus. There were others. I've seen very high quality Jensen and JBL speaker components in the better consoles (albeit in open enclosures where if there is any bass playback ability, the record-wrecker NEEDS to track at 3 grams to avoid bouncing around). The top-line Ampex console had EL34 tubes and an ultralinear output transformer. The preamp was also a good design, with a phono EQ loop similar to the playback EQ loop design of the 351 tape deck. Alas, otherwise fine components were compromised by a Garrard record-wrecker and a junko Ampex A/900/1200/F-type tape deck.
>
> Net-net, I prefer to sit on my furniture and have my stereo components specialized and separated. I've never heard an "integrated" or "console" speaker system that sounds anywhere as good as separate speakers.
>
> The only really positive thing I can say about console stereos is that they may have a higher WAF (Wife Acceptance Factor) than a bunch of naked components connected by fat wires in the living room. A compromise is a nice-looking cabinet for the components that hides the wires and provides solid physics-based isolation for a turntable. Distance from the speakers is the best physics-based solution.
>
> Old floor-standing radios are a different matter altogether. Aside from the fact that there's nothing worth hearing on most airwaves, they are neato antiques and restoring them can be a great way to master some electronics and furniture crafts. I have a great old Philco that I bought at a yard sale for a few bucks. I bought a little pocket AM transmitter and cobbled a hookup to my iPod. It's great fun to listen to OTR programs through the old from-the-time radio.
>
> Despite my strong opinions about antique console stereos, there appears to be a market for a modern take on the idea:
> http://uncrate.com/stuff/symbol-record-console/
> I saw this at the NY Audio Show and it does sound quite good. However, because there is a subwoofer built into the support column, if one cranks up the volume, rumble and feedback travel into the turntable. This would be fine for a small apartment in Brooklyn, but not for a larger-sized room if one wants to listen at realistic SPLs. For that $18.5K, you could get a very nice separate-component system featuring a very fine pair of full-range speakers, a decent turntable and high-quality amplification, along with a good CD player and DAC.
>
> -- Tom Fine
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roger Kulp" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 6:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Need helping identifying a reel to reel deck
>
>
>> I belong to a couple of online groups for enthusiasts of console radio/phonos.We are out there.The better ones have tracking forces well under 4 grams,not record grinders at all.http://midimagic.sgc-hosting.com/collaro.htmhttp://midimagic.sgc-hosting.com/changerx.htmThere isn't a one of us who would own a BSR.They are universally considered cheap junk,associated with bottom of the barrel console brands like Lloyds.BIC is another such brand.Roger > Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 16:30:01 -0400> From: [log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Need helping identifying a reel to reel deck> To: [log in to unmask]> > Ditto. Had a BSR in'72. Had a Lafayette amp - soldered it myself. Had Criterion 100B loudspeakers. Actually, one to start with, then another one the next Christmas. Still had them up to a couple years ago. They were absolutely dreadful.> > -----Original Message-----> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tom Fine> Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 3:42 PM> To: [log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Need helping identifying a reel to reel deck> > Hey -- Lafayette -- my first "stereo system" was from there. 10th birthday present. A little transistor amp, a BSR record-wrecker with a ceramic cartridge and two little particle-board with wood veneer speakers. This is the system on which I discovered the Beatles and Beethoven.> > -- Tom Fine> > ----- Original Message -----> From: "Michael Biel" <[log in to unmask]>> To: <[log in to unmask]>> Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 2:44 PM> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Need helping identifying a reel to reel deck> > > > My set of Lafayette catalogs and flyers (complete 1957-end, with a few> > from the late 30s to early 50s) are in my warehouse so I am glad Richard> > found these ads.  Especially glad since it is great to find a suburban> > NYC paper on-line.  I've needed access to ads like this for my research!> > Like Richard I was a regular at Lafayette, but at the Route 17 Paramus> > NJ store.  I'd fill out a blank for parts I needed and turn it in to the> > counter and they NEVER had all of what I needed and I had to do a mail> > order anyway!  My first ten reels of tape are Lafayette brand, bought in> > the Paramus store in Jan 1960 and STILL in fine playable condition.> > 1-1/2 mil acetate 1200 feet in a blue box.  I have one Lafayette orange> > box 1 mil mylar 1800 feet and it also is in great playable condition.> > Lots of Jack Paar shows including his final Tonight Show.> >> >> > Mike Biel  [log in to unmask]> >> >> >  --------  Original Message --------> > Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Need helping identifying a reel to reel deck> > From: "Richard L. Hess" <[log in to unmask]>> > Date: Wed, July 03, 2013 2:21 pm> > To: [log in to unmask]> >> > Hi, Peter,> >> > I remember going with my father to Lafayette Radio -- and later my mom> > took me -- when they were still in Jamaica, NY. They had a multi-story> > old factory-type building there--I remember an old wood water tower on> > it, but I could be mis-remembering. Later they moved to Syosset and> > expanded into a multi-store chain and then collapsed.> >> > For the Washington's Birthday Sale in 1968, they were selling the> > machine for $99.88 "Save Over $30".> >> > http://fultonhistory.com/newspaper%2010/Yonkers%20NY%20Herald%20Statesman/Yonkers%20NY%20Herald%20Statesman%201968%20%20Grayscale/Yonkers%20NY%20Herald%20Statesman%201968%20%20Grayscale%20-%201619.pdf> >> > Later, on May 1, 1968 they were advertising their Gala 47th Anniversary> >> > with this machine at $99.95 "Save $30".> >> > http://fultonhistory.com/newspaper%2010/Yonkers%20NY%20Herald%20Statesman/Yonkers%20NY%20Herald%20Statesman%201968%20%20Grayscale/Yonkers%20NY%20Herald%20Statesman%201968%20%20Grayscale%20-%201619.pdf> >> > It was a three-speed machine 1.88, 3.75, 7.5.> >> > The Sams Photofact is now available. I'm glad to see Sams

-- 
בברכה,
שי דרורי
מומחה לשימור והמרה של אודיו וידאו וסרטים 8-35 ממ.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager