If there is no conflict with any other corporate body named Interferenzen, 
the place held goes in $c.  It is not being added to distinguish one 
corporate body from another, which would be in $a.  There is currently no 
equivalent to the LCRI that said to leave the place off for ongoing 
conferences.  However, there is a proposal to do that which will be 
considered at the JSC's November meeting: see 
http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/6JSC-BL-14-rev.pdf

For now, assuming no conflict, the access point for the ongoing exhibition 
would be:

111 2# Interferenzen (Exhibition) $c (Vienna, Austria)

For individual instances you would add in the number and year:

111 2# Interferenzen (Exhibition) $n (1st : $d 1990 $c Vienna, Austria)

Some similar examples:

n  87837190  111 2# Bumbershoot (Festival) $c (Seattle, Wash.)
n  00145838  111 2# Toronto International Film Festival $c (Toronto, Ont.)


--Adam Schiff
University of Washington Libraries

On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, Cuneo, Mary Jane wrote:

> Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 18:49:06 +0000
> From: "Cuneo, Mary Jane" <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Conferences/Exhibitions
> 
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have a couple of questions for the Collective Wisdom about authorized access points for conferences/events.
>
> There was an ongoing exhibition name established under AACR2:
>
> 111 2#  Interferenzen
>
> (It?s not a named event under RIs 24.7 and 24.8, but nevermind.)  Since I am cataloging several of these, which all took place during 1990 and 1991, I wanted to re-evaluate the record and recode it for RDA.  I have added (Exhibition) because of 11.13.1.2, but now I think I need to qualify by place too because all of the exhibitions were held in Vienna (11.13.1.8.2).  Under AACR2, rule 24.7B4 said to do this, but its RI said not to; I can?t find an equivalent policy statement to negate the RDA instruction.  So, first question:  For the collective name, is this correct:
>
> 111 2#  Interferenzen (Exhibition : Vienna, Austria)
>
> Second question:  If the above form is correct, should the location be repeated in subfield c in the authorized access points for the individual exhibitions?
>
> 111 2#  Interferenzen (Exhibition : Vienna, Austria) ?n (1st : ?d1990 ?c Vienna, Austria)
>
> Ana Crist?n?s Power Point titled: RDA Special Topics: Conferences (from RDA Refresher Training at LC) has examples where the location in the first set of parentheses is broader than the location in the second set, like this:
>
> 111 2# ATE (Conference : Canada) ?n (10th : ?d1999 ?cOttawa, Ont.)
>
> but no examples where they are the same.
>
> Thanks much,
>
> Mary Jane Cuneo
> Serials cataloging and NACO
> Information and Technical Services
> Harvard Library
>
>
>
>
>
>

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Adam L. Schiff
Principal Cataloger
University of Washington Libraries
Box 352900
Seattle, WA 98195-2900
(206) 543-8409
(206) 685-8782 fax
[log in to unmask]
http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~