Gee, Lou, I guess my error is to be expected after all.
No, I haven't used it.
If you have used it, would you like to post some example of it going after print-through? This would
be a very useful tool for many of us, if it works.
-- Tom Fine
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lou Judson" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 9:42 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Advice needed on removing / minimizing tape bleed-through
> Tom, what you describe about time constants dos not make sense in my experience with RX1, 2, and 3
> Advanced. You don't set it in a time-based way; it responds to program material in more or less
> real time (plus the latency for processing).
> If you haven't used it, your error is to be expected, but if you have, then whatever do you mean
> by time constant?
> Lou Judson
> Intuitive Audio
> On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:02 PM, Tom Fine wrote:
>> I would think you'd need to constantly tweak the Izotope software because the time constant
>> wouldn't be, well, constant. Print-through is layer-to-layer, so as the tape unwinds, the
>> distance between layers decreases and thus the echo time decreases. I do think very tasteful use
>> of gating is the best way to handle this problem, especially for less-complex source material
>> such as a single voice. You won't get rid of it, but you might make it less anooying without too
>> badly screwing up the dynamics of the voice performance.