On 11/20/2013 8:30 AM, John Haley wrote:
> The resulting
> 192/24 signal has thus been unnecessarily converted twice already and
> subjected to a bunch of old analog electronics.
Not so old; GML equipment is contemporary, still in production. It's
very high-quality; if anything should be transparent, GML stuff should be.
I agree with you about the conversions, though.