> >  The current focus is on "we know how we did it in MARC, now can we do
> > the same thing in Bibframe?".
> 
> But why would we want to? What is the point of change if the goal is to do
> the same thing? 

+1

> Couldn't we spend some time brainstorming on what we
> could do with linked data, not just how to drag everything about MARC into a
> new serialization?

Haven't we discussed that at length already, and the answer always was along the lines of "But then we cannot losslessly reuse our MARC data"?

/Lars