What about the offerings from Nitty Gritty? I have one of their units
and am very happy with it. I think they are priced less than VPI.
On 3/15/2014 12:49 PM, Tom Fine wrote:
> Hi Duane:
> Agreed that the Spin-Clean is not on par with something like a VPI.
> So what are your recommendations "for less money"?
> -- Tom Fine
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "H D Goldman" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2014 12:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] WSJ article on vinyl playbackl equipment
>> With respect to your comments concerning phonograph record cleaning ...
>> For less money, there are audibly superior materials & methods
>> available for cleaning phonograph records than a device based on
>> re-using an increasingly contaminated bath & a cleaning formulation
>> with limited ability to remove the contaminants routinely found on
>> new & used records.
>> Most of us don't re-use the water we use to bathe, clean our teeth or
>> wash our clothes & dishes. Why would it be ok for phonograph records.
>> Duane Goldman
>> On Mar 15, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
>>> One other comment about this "starter" vinyl system. It will
>>> definitely produce far superior sound to vintage record-wreckers,
>>> anything sold by "Crosley" and most other catalog-sold
>>> self-contained "record players." If any listmembers or their
>>> friends/family are considering plungeing into vinyl (it'll be a deep
>>> dive before you're done, be forewarned!), I recommend the following:
>>> -- Tom Fine
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Ramm" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2014 11:04 AM
>>> Subject: [ARSCLIST] WSJ article on vinyl playbackl equipment
>> H D Goldman Lagniappe Chemicals Ltd.
>> PO Box 37066 St. Louis, MO 63141 USA
>> v/f 314 205 1388 [log in to unmask]
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.