LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  March 2014

ARSCLIST March 2014

Subject:

Re: WSJ article on vinyl playbackl equipment

From:

Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 15 Mar 2014 17:30:26 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (79 lines)

Yes, definitely. I was just trying to keep the budget low and the process simple for a beginner, 
which was the point of the original WSJ article.

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Schroth" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2014 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] WSJ article on vinyl playbackl equipment


> Tom:
>
> What about the offerings from Nitty Gritty? I have one of their units and am very happy with it. I 
> think they are priced less than VPI.
>
> Regards,
>
> John Schroth
>
> On 3/15/2014 12:49 PM, Tom Fine wrote:
>> Hi Duane:
>>
>> Agreed that the Spin-Clean is not on par with something like a VPI.
>>
>> So what are your recommendations "for less money"?
>>
>> -- Tom Fine
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "H D Goldman" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2014 12:07 PM
>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] WSJ article on vinyl playbackl equipment
>>
>>
>>> With respect to your comments concerning phonograph record cleaning ...
>>>
>>> For less money, there are audibly superior materials & methods available for cleaning phonograph 
>>> records than a device based on re-using an increasingly contaminated bath & a cleaning 
>>> formulation with limited ability to remove the contaminants routinely found on new & used 
>>> records.
>>>
>>> Most of us don't re-use the water we use to bathe, clean our teeth or wash our clothes & dishes. 
>>> Why would it be ok for phonograph records.
>>>
>>> Duane Goldman
>>>
>>> On Mar 15, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> One other comment about this "starter" vinyl system. It will definitely produce far superior 
>>>> sound to vintage record-wreckers, anything sold by "Crosley" and most other catalog-sold 
>>>> self-contained "record players." If any listmembers or their friends/family are considering 
>>>> plungeing into vinyl (it'll be a deep dive before you're done, be forewarned!), I recommend the 
>>>> following:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- Tom Fine
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Ramm" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2014 11:04 AM
>>>> Subject: [ARSCLIST] WSJ article on vinyl playbackl equipment
>>>
>>>
>>> H D Goldman Lagniappe Chemicals Ltd.
>>> PO Box 37066 St. Louis, MO 63141 USA
>>> v/f 314 205 1388 [log in to unmask]
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
>
> 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Error during command authentication.

Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started.

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager