Agreed that the Spin-Clean is not on par with something like a VPI.
So what are your recommendations "for less money"?
-- Tom Fine
----- Original Message -----
From: "H D Goldman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2014 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] WSJ article on vinyl playbackl equipment
> With respect to your comments concerning phonograph record cleaning ...
> For less money, there are audibly superior materials & methods available for cleaning phonograph
> records than a device based on re-using an increasingly contaminated bath & a cleaning formulation
> with limited ability to remove the contaminants routinely found on new & used records.
> Most of us don't re-use the water we use to bathe, clean our teeth or wash our clothes & dishes.
> Why would it be ok for phonograph records.
> Duane Goldman
> On Mar 15, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> One other comment about this "starter" vinyl system. It will definitely produce far superior
>> sound to vintage record-wreckers, anything sold by "Crosley" and most other catalog-sold
>> self-contained "record players." If any listmembers or their friends/family are considering
>> plungeing into vinyl (it'll be a deep dive before you're done, be forewarned!), I recommend the
>> -- Tom Fine
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Ramm" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2014 11:04 AM
>> Subject: [ARSCLIST] WSJ article on vinyl playbackl equipment
> H D Goldman Lagniappe Chemicals Ltd.
> PO Box 37066 St. Louis, MO 63141 USA
> v/f 314 205 1388 [log in to unmask]