LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  March 2014

ARSCLIST March 2014

Subject:

Re: Jewel cases

From:

DAVID BURNHAM <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

DAVID BURNHAM <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 31 Mar 2014 11:20:19 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (141 lines)

Peter's experience is the same as mine.  I do not remove the CDs from their original cases and store them any other way, I don't store them in a climate controlled environment and like Peter some of my CDs, (I must have at least 15k but I haven't counted them in years), are rarely if ever touched while other ones are played regularly.  The first CDs I purchased, (in 1982), still play as well today as they did on day one.  Certainly I'll agree with those who will counter that CD players have extremely efficient error correction so that even though the CDs may not be perfect anymore, they will still sound like new.  LPs, however, that have been on a shelf for 30+ years will likely have added noise from surface deposits or deterioration, even if they haven't been played.

db
On Monday, March 31, 2014 1:48:06 PM, Peter Hirsch <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
 
I don't have any real opinion on the eventual disappearance of the CD,
>though my vantage point as a library-person would confirm that they are
>still circulated in large numbers, for now at least.
>
>What moves me to comment is the many postings stating how fragile CDs are
>and how important it is to keep the surfaces out of contact with anything
>for fear of damaging the disc.
>
>As some may remember, whenever the discussion of disc storage comes up on
>the list, I have related my personal experience with tossing the jewel
>boxes and using a combination of Tyvek inner sleeve and plastic (I don not
>know its composition) outer sleeve to house the disc with its tray card and
>booklet. I apologize for tiresomely repeating this one more time, but my
>point is that I have not experienced any signs of damage, de-lamination or
>deterioration of ANY of my discs in the close to 20 years that I have have
>stored them this way. I am talking about a few thousand (I really have no
>idea how many that is, but pretty certain it is over 5K)
>
>Am I just lucky, has the fragility factor been overstated or maybe there
>are some additional facets regarding handling and storage that haven't been
>commented on yet. I suppose that the fact that the number of items I have
>may reduce the likelihood of any one disc having to see much action over
>the years, though I have plenty that I do return to on occasion.
>
>Not a criticism or commentary on anyone in particular that has contributed
>so far. Just some thoughts.
>
>Peter Hirsch
>
>
>
>On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>
>> The Japanese have a nice compromise design I've seen a few times. It's a
>> "mini-LP cover," but not so small and tight as to crunch the CD as Roger
>> describes. Inside the cardboard jacket is soft inner sleeve, sometimes
>> lined with a fabric and sometimes just a soft plastic like is used for some
>> LP inner sleeves. Sometimes the cardboard jacket is also covered in clear
>> plastic, like most of us do for our LPs.
>>
>> This kind of packaging likely costs $$$, but the Japanese CD market is not
>> commodity-priced like in the US and Europe. With CD price for back-catalog
>> items now down around $5-7 for single discs and $1-4 in reissue many-disc
>> box sets, you get what you pay for as far as protective packaging. Expect
>> even flimsier if oil prices head up again.
>>
>> Regarding Roger's question about libraries and submerging media, I think
>> that will be a problem when the day comes, but there are still billions of
>> CDs manufacturered every year. In theory, I can see everything going
>> "virtual" at some point, but I'm sure not going to predict when the last CD
>> production plant is going to close down!
>>
>> -- Tom Fine
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roger Kulp" <
>> [log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 10:47 AM
>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Jewel cases
>>
>>
>>  What's the consensus on those "gatefold"  cases that are part
>>> plastic,part paper,that have a plastic tray inside for the CD?I don't know
>>> what they are called,but they seem very poorly designed to me.
>>>
>>> The cardboard covers you speak of are no doubt the ones called "mini LP
>>> covers".It can be difficult to get the CDs in and out of these covers.I
>>> think a big attraction of these for labels is they are very cheap to
>>> produce. I know a lot of CD collectors who do not store their CDs in the
>>> original cases,no matter what the design.The discs are all stored in
>>> envelopes with plastic widows and flaps,with the envelopes inside soft
>>> plastic pouches.
>>>
>>> CDs are actually as brittle as LPs,if not moreso.Like styrene 45s,CDs
>>> crack,very easily.Especially when removing the disc from the center hub.I
>>> have seen this too many times.
>>>
>>> Speaking of libraries,what are libraries,especially public
>>> libraries,going to do, when the CD is no longer a mass produced item,but a
>>> high priced niche product for audiophiles and collectors?This is definitely
>>> where all physical media is headed.
>>>
>>> Roger
>>>
>>>
>>>  Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 23:45:04 +0200
>>>> From: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Jewel cases
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>
>>>> Agreed
>>>> בתאריך 30/03/14 11:15 PM, ציטוט Tom Fine:
>>>> > The big problem with the original jewel case design was using
>>>> > hard/brittle plastic. All of the librarians on this list know what I'm
>>>> > talking about. The jewel cases don't stand up to hard use like library
>>>> > circulation. The Gaylord cases, made of soft plastic, are much better.
>>>> > However, they are more expensive than commodity-priced jewel cases. I
>>>> > for one do not like cardboard slip-covers for CDs. They don't protect
>>>> > the disc surface well (neither do jewel cases that have been mangled).
>>>> >
>>>> > The SACD-style jewel cases have a more rigorous center-spindle holder,
>>>> > so they are probably less likely to get broken in that place from
>>>> > heavy use. However, they still have brittle plastic hinges, and that
>>>> > is a prime weak spot in the design.
>>>> >
>>>> > I have offered, several times, to do a free seminar for librarians in
>>>> > the local county-wide library system, about proper handling and care
>>>> > of CDs and DVDs. No takers. I guess it's cheaper to replace broken
>>>> > ones (or just keep them in circulation) than to get educated and
>>>> > educate patrons about proper handling. Of course, the record companies
>>>> > did a bad job on this from day 1 by saying CDs were "more robust" than
>>>> > LPs. They're not except in very specific cases like straight-line
>>>> > center-to-edge scratches.
>>>> >
>>>> > With so many titles going out of print on CD, and with budgets tight,
>>>> > libraries should strive to take better care of their media assets, and
>>>> > insist that patrons do, too.
>>>> >
>>>> > -- Tom Fine
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Shai Drori
>>>> Timeless Recordings
>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>> בברכה,
>>>> שי דרורי
>>>> מומחה לשימור והמרה של אודיו וידאו וסרטים 8-35 ממ.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager