Yes, we would generally record the copyright date in a second 264 even
when a publication date is present on the resource, not just when we are
supplying a probable publication date.
Adam
On Tue, 4 Mar 2014, john g marr wrote:
> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:16:11 -0700
> From: john g marr <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: RDA dates and publishing information
>
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2014, Adam L. Schiff wrote:
>
>> Here at U of Washington, we have decided to generally also give the
>> copyright date
>
> Would that then suggest the utility of providing the copyright date in cases
> where the both publication date (not bracketed) and copyright date are
> available (e.g. both "c2014" and "First published 2014" on t.p. verso) and
> would that be done in 2 separate 264 fields?
>
> jgm
>
> John G. Marr
> Cataloger
> CDS, UL
> Univ. of New Mexico
> Albuquerque, NM 87131
> [log in to unmask]
> [log in to unmask]
>
> Opinions belong exclusively to the individuals expressing them, but
> sharing is permitted.
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Adam L. Schiff
Principal Cataloger
University of Washington Libraries
Box 352900
Seattle, WA 98195-2900
(206) 543-8409
(206) 685-8782 fax
[log in to unmask]
http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|