LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  April 2014

ARSCLIST April 2014

Subject:

Re: Was "Searching for the CBS Radio Play 'I Was There' 3/31/1940," now "reach out"

From:

Pamela Gaudiano <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 8 Apr 2014 17:57:54 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (171 lines)

Hi all,
I would like to tell you how much I am enjoying the various definitions of
'reached out.' Upon reading the term again in my email I will admit it
does sound a bit odd.

In addition, I found a copy of the script to the Radio Play at Ohio State
University. They have copies of the scripts from  "I Was There" in their
collection. The script mentions a survivor from the bombing in 1920 taking
part in the broadcast, therefore we are really curious to hear the
recording. 

I will 'touch base' with the Paley Center directly as a few people have
noted they might have some information.

Thanks all - Pam
-----
Pam Gaudiano
Associate Producer
American Experience
[log in to unmask]
Office: (617) 300-5397
Cell: (617) 515-6185

WGBH
1 Guest Street
Boston, MA 02135




On 4/8/14 12:37 PM, "Daniel Eagan" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>I consult at times at JPMorgan, where "reach out" means "contact" by any
>means: e-mail, phone, text, walking over to someone's cublcle or office,
>asking someone in an elevator.  "Reach out" suggests taking an extra
>step, going outside your unit or office or branch‹because otherwise
>you're supposed to get all the info you need within your own group.  It
>also suggests that you did not get an answer or even reply, which is why
>you're now seeking help from people you did not contact yet.
>
>I think the phrase has a certain visual appeal.  It also expresses more
>than saying you telephoned or e-mailed somebody.
>
>The phrase that bothers me in that environment is "no worries," a
>catchall reply for any apology.
>
>Daniel Eagan
>[log in to unmask]
>http://filmlegacy.net/
>
>
>
>
>On Apr 8, 2014, at 12:17 PM, Tom Fine wrote:
>
>> Hi Chris:
>> 
>> "Reached out" is one of commentator Bill O'Reilly's pet English
>>Language peeves (and yet he calls PUNDITS "pundents," which isn't even a
>>word).
>> 
>> Yes, in the current American vernacular, "reach out" usually means "I
>>e-mailed you" and maybe got no reply. This is ironic because I'm sure
>>the term became common from the old AT&T commercial tag-line "Reach
>>Out/Reach Out and Touch Someone," used to promote ridiculously expensive
>>long-distance telephony in the old days.
>> 
>> I agree with you that a telephone call tends to be a more effective
>>tool to obtain information. But, I also think that e-mail is among the
>>most polite forms of communication because it's non-invasive (one
>>chooses to get their e-mail when they wish, and to respond when they
>>wish, as opposed to having to stop what they're doing and answer a
>>ringing telephone). I consider telephony somewhat rude, and generally
>>keep my cellphone turned off and turn the ringer off on my landline if I
>>am doing anything that can't afford interruption.
>> 
>> -- Tom Fine
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris J Brady"
>><[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:48 AM
>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Searching for the CBS Radio Play 'I Was There'
>>3/31/1940
>> 
>> 
>>> I am puzzled by the strange business jargon term 'reached out' - never
>>>heard of that in the UK - does that mean you emailed them, or called
>>>them, wrote a letter to them, etc.
>>> 
>>> I assume that you emailed them.
>>> 
>>> Therefore why not call them directly. Maybe then you'd get a response.
>>>Its sounds like the CBS archives will hold the recording - likely on
>>>78rpm disc - if it exists. So they are the folk to call.
>>> 
>>> Meanwhile a search on Google got this:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>http://tampabayhistorycenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/cotanchobee_
>>>winter_2012.pdf
>>> 
>>> Maybe the script still exists.
>>> 
>>> CJB.
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------------
>>> On Mon, 7/4/14, Pamela Gaudiano <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Subject: [ARSCLIST] Searching for the CBS Radio Play 'I Was There'
>>>3/31/1940
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Date: Monday, 7 April, 2014, 20:45
>>> 
>>> To Whom It May Concern;
>>> 
>>> I am writing to you from the PBS History series American
>>> Experience. I'm hoping you can help me with tracking down
>>> the recording of a radio play from 1940, or determine that
>>> the recording still exists. We are researching for a
>>> documentary on the Wall Street Bombing attack that occurred
>>> on September 16, 1920. I wanted to see if there was the
>>> following recording from a CBS Radio Play:
>>> 
>>> "I Was There" a radio series - program, number 12
>>> Description:
>>> "Columbia Broadcasting System presents the stories that have
>>> made the headlines -- stories and dramatizations of
>>> outstanding happenings as told by the people who actually
>>> saw them, the historical -- the humorous -- the human side
>>> of events of our time." p.2 (Script 1).
>>> Stories presented: September 1920 -- New York City --
>>> Mystery bomb wrecks Wall Street ; June 1933 -- Siberian
>>> Wastelands -- Pilot forced down in world flight ; 1902 --
>>> Harlow, Montana -- Calamity Jane abandons adventure! ; April
>>> 1906 -- San Francisco, California -- Fire rages through city
>>> following devastating earthquake!
>>> 
>>> Aired: 9:30-10:00 p.m., PST. -- Sunday, March 31, 1940.
>>> 
>>> Credits: Written, Jerome Lawrence ; [Edited, Everett
>>> Tomlinson ; Produced, Russ Johnston ; Composed and
>>> conducted, Wilbur Hatch ; Announcer, Arthur Gilmore] ;
>>> Commentator, Knox Manning.
>>> 
>>> I have reached out to the Archives at the Library of
>>> Congress and they do not have any CBS recording for that
>>> program. I also reached out to T3 Media that handles the CBS
>>> archives and I haven't heard back. The Museum of Broadcast
>>> Communication doesn't have anything. I also haven't heard
>>> back from the Paley Center. If you know of any Archives that
>>> might might have something like this I would greatly
>>> appreciate you forwarding me this information.
>>> 
>>> Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you for
>>> your time.
>>> Best, Pam
>>> -----
>>> Pam Gaudiano
>>> Associate Producer
>>> American Experience
>>> [log in to unmask]
>>> Office: (617) 300-5397
>>> Cell: (617) 515-6185
>>> 
>>> WGBH
>>> 1 Guest Street
>>> Boston, MA 02135
>>> 
>>> 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager