LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  June 2014

ARSCLIST June 2014

Subject:

Re: Phonobomb examples? [specifically Respighi]

From:

Roger Kulp <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 18 Jun 2014 18:29:01 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

Have there been any birds recorded that have since become extinct? The bit about if it was the 1913 or 1910 recording preferred by Respighi is one of the most interesting questions I ever heard.  Roger > Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:19:01 -0400> From: [log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Phonobomb examples? [specifically Respighi]> To: [log in to unmask]> > Also, although Respighi lived well into the era of electrical recording and reproduction, he insisted that a specific recording of nightingales, (its number noted in the score), be played on an acoustic gramophone in the percussion section. I would love to hear it performed in this manner, it would sound quite haunting, but in spite of the fact that there are so many authentic performance enthusiasts around these days, it's never done.  > > db> > Sent from my iPhone> > > On Jun 18, 2014, at 5:56 PM, George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]> wrote:> > > > From: Patent Tactics, George Brock-Nannestad> > > > > > In the unpublished "Bird Songs on Historic Records" discography > > the following information is given:> > > > > > All the nightingale records were originally issued single-sided. Regarding > > the coupling discussed, the 1910 recording was made 3 May 1910. The 1913 > > recording was recorded during the week ending 24 May 1913. The Victor 64161 > > (Red Seal) is neither of these two recordings.> > > > Among the double-sided versions,  R. 6105 was from Italy; the UK market had > > B. 390. > > > > "The British HMV company transferred B. 390 to its "Number 2 Catalogue" of > > records of unique and historical interest in 1929. This was because the > > composer Respighi required a gramophone record of Nightingale song to be > > played during a movement of his orchestral work "The Pines of Rome", composed > > in 1925. Actually, the score requests the record by its Italian number > > (R.6105), and does not say whether the 1910 recording or the 1913 one is > > preferred. B. 390 remained in the "Number 2 Catalogue" until its deletion in > > 1942; there, both sides were given the date "1910"."> > > > Personally, I find the term "phonobomb" absolutely silly, reminding me of a > > sort of Italian ice cream, and although nobody will care I shall refrain from > > using it to describe the phenomenon alluded to. But given enough publicity, > > no doubt it will catch on and end up on the Library of Congress Recording > > Registry.> > > > Kind regards,> > > > > > George> > > > ------------------------------------> >> > >> It also came on Victor and was redone electrically.  > >> > >> I seem to recall that the parts for Pines of Rome were rental only and> >> when> >> your packet arrived, a copy of the 78 was packed with it.  I don't know if> >> the later, electrical one arrived in your packet after 1925 or whenever it> >> was remade.  I kinda think the acoustical one was used for a while> >> afterwards.  Maybe someone at the Fleisher Orchestra Music Collection at> >> the> >> Free Library of Philadekphia would know.> >> > >> Of couse, this implied that the performing orchestra would have a> >> phonograph> >> available, and a model with sufficient volume to be heard in  the back of> >> the balcony.  This was not a sure thing.  Some members of some> >> professional> >> orchestra boards of the time opposed the whole idea of recording, just as> >> they did when broadcasting came along- cheapened the merchandise or, in> >> this> >> case, cheepened it. > >> > >> Steve Smolian> >> > >> -----Original Message-----> >> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List> >> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Don Cox> >> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 3:38 PM> >> To: [log in to unmask]> >> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Phonobomb examples? [specifically Respighi]> >> > >>> On 18/06/2014, Williams, Tim wrote:> >>> > >>> For Don and any others curious about whose nightingale recording > >>> Respighi used for Pines of Rome...> >>> > >>> A couple years ago, we had a library patron who does orchestra program > >>> notes who also wondered this.> >>> > >>> The short answer is probably Carl Reich in 1910 or 1913.  > >>> > >>> Here's what we came up with for the patron:> >>> > >>> In the 1925 Ricordi score for Pini di Roma, Respighi, lists Grammofono > >>> in the instrumentation and there's a footnote that states "No. R. 1605 > >>> del 'Concert Record Gramophone': Il Canto dell'usignolo."> >>> > >>> The "1605" is incorrect. Page 55 of the score, when the Grammofono is > >>> actually used, has the correct footnote: "No. R. 6105 del 'Concert > >>> Record Gramophone: Il canto dell'usignolo."> >>> > >>> That R. 6105 entry in the Italian record catalog is for "VOCI DELLA > >>> NATURA (Bremen)," dates 1910 and 1913.> >>> > >>> So in the His Master's Voice: The German Catalogue (1898-1929) book, > >>> there is an entry for "NACHTIGALL-SCHLAG, Besitzer Carl Reich > >>> (Bremen)" and the recordings were made in May 1910 and May 1913. Those > >>> dates and location match up with the "VOCI DELLA NATURA (Bremen)"> >>> entry in the Italian catalog. So I think we can assume that the "Il > >>> canto del usignolo" recording used by Respighi was the one made by > >>> Carl Reich and issued in both Germany and Italy (and possibly > >>> elsewhere).> >>> > >>> > >>> It's also interesting that the percussionist of the orchestra for > >>> which these liner notes were researched talked about all the different > >>> formats they've used over the years (phonograph, reel-to-reel, > >>> computer, etc.) but also said, that if any of them don't work, he's > >>> prepared to just whistle a nightingale's bird call himself!> >>> > >> That's very interesting. Thanks.> >> > >> Regards> >> --> >> Don Cox> >> [log in to unmask] 		 	   		  

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager