LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  June 2014

ARSCLIST June 2014

Subject:

Re: The guy who cleans his 78s with spit.

From:

"Randy A. Riddle" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 23 Jun 2014 06:11:53 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (168 lines)

I was looking at some Edison Diamond Discs at an antique shop several years
ago.  The dealer noticed me and said, "If you clean them with Pledge, they
turn out real nice."

And, yes, the discs smelled lemony fresh.

Randy



On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:03 AM, Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Over the years we have had lots of long and heated discussions of how to
> clean your records.  It was the most difficult subject we have.  As I
> have mentioned, a lot of record collecting discussion has moved over to
> Facebook, and a mixture of old hands and newbies have blended uneasily.
> Well, the cleaning discussion finally hit, and hit hard.  Two threads on
> "78 rpm records & cylinders fan group" opened up at the same time.  Once
> concerned STEAM CLEANING 78s!!!!  The other concerned mold and mold
> spores on acetates.  We explained that the steam would be great if you
> wanted to make a vase out of your record, and that there was no mold or
> mold spores on the lacquer disc, it was Palmetic acid.  Then came the
> suggestions to use WD40 to clean records.  Ammonia to clean 78s.  But
> finally, when we thought we had heard every possible method came word
> from a guy who feels that the Doctor's Miracle Record Cleaner is too
> hard on records but that he uses SPIT to clean his.  A thousand records
> a month he cleans with spit.  Then he rinses them with distilled water.
> Then after they are dry he plays them backwards and forward and
> backwards and forwards to clean out all the debris in the grooves.
>
> Here is his part of the discussion with my answers and a few other
> comments.
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Greg Butler--- saliva is excellent
>
> Greg Butler--- yes a very worn clean cloth and a bit of spit rub in the
> direction
> of the grooves - never be tempted to use anything that includes solvents
>
> and I include "disc doctor"!
>
> Greg Butler--- clean off with distilled water and dry again with another
> old worn clean dry cloth
>
> Greg Butler--- amazingly shellac is very tough so some people us a
> scrubbing brush - the grey powder at the bottom of grooves is usually
> not shellac but steel needle residue that has been worn down by the
> record...
>
> Michael Biel--- Another reason why NOT to continue to play records with
> acoustical players and steel needles. You can't help what was done 70
> years ago but you can stop now. Plus, the Brits loved to use fibre and
> thorns which created a nice juicy gunk in the grooves. There are now
> some fully scientific studies being made on all sorts of cleaning
> methods, and if I had brought these two threads of comments to the
> recent ARSC conference where this was discussed, they would still be
> laughing.
>
> Doug Benson--- HI Greg Butler! Do you really spit on your records? Do
> you have any idea what all is present in human saliva?? And while I'm
> asking questions, have you ever actually tried Disc Doctor?
>
> [He never did answer that question -- his only cleaning fluid is spit
> with a water rinse]
>
> Greg Butler---  after cleaning, it is good to run the discs backwards
> and forwards and backwards and forwards a couple of times using a
> sacrificial stylus to clear remaining debris out of the grooves - we can
> do this quite easily with the numark decks we use for our radio shows.
>
> Michael Biel--- If the record is properly cleaned (e.g. not using spit),
> shoveling remaining debris out of the groove is unnecessary because the
> cleaning got all the debris. That there is debris shows the record was
> improperly cleaned.
>
> Greg Butler--- saliva is very mild it has natural enzymes designed to
> loosen debris from your teeth and is certainly less aggresive than any
> sort of solvent - it does of course need to be washed off afterwards
> with clean water - but very often - it is the only form of cleaner
> available! Mechanical removal is the most effective - but again great
> care is required and I always simply recommend a lint free cleaning
> cloth and/or fine brush - the record should be dry before playing
> backwards and forwards - but it certainly does help. The best method of
> dirt removal is highly dependent upon what the dirt actually is - and
> sometime you may have no choice to use something more aggresive - but as
> Michael Biel and others point out - as much care as possible is required
> to avoid anything that will actually damage the shellac! Not every case
> is the same - but without knowing the actual chemical makeup of the
> contaminant caution is required.
>
>
> Michael Biel--- Saliva is a dreadfully bad and inefficient cleaner of
> eyeglasses. If you can't even get your glasses clean with spit, it will
> be far worse cleaning records. Cleaning cloths are useless getting dirt
> out of grooves. ONLY a brush will do it. Even back in the 1920s it was
> recommended to use a brush. Every cleaning method uses a brush to get
> into the groove. Properly designed brushes are sized and shaped to fit
> the groove. If the record is cleaned properly there will be no residue
> to be removed by the needle. That you have much shows that you are not
> cleaning correctly.
>
>
> Greg Butler--- There would be something very wrong if you had the sort
> of dirt I often find on 78s on your eyeglasses! I think you are starting
> to be a bit ridiculous Michael I buy over 1000 records every month and
> some of them need more than a brush I can assure you!
>
> Michael Biel--- If saliva cannot get the small amount of dirt off of
> eyeglasses, why in the world do you think that you can get worse dirt
> off of the records????? Eyeglasses are the best case scenario -- the
> EASIEST stuff to clean off and saliva can't do it properly. And you
> think that saliva can clean the dirt off of your admittedly much dirtier
> records????? Are you sober???? Do you realize that you are suggesting
> the use of saliva to clean records???
>
> Greg Butler--- now you are just sounding stupid - have you actualy ever
> cleaned a really dirty 78? I can assure you saliva does work and works
> without damaging the record
>
> Michael Biel--- For over 60 years I have cleaned records using properly
> designed cleaning materials and surfactants like Disc Doctor and special
> 78 formulas, brushes designed to get into the grooves, and several
> different machines. And I never had to resort to clearing out debris by
> running a record back and forth and back and forth like you do because
> your spit and a cloth are not really cleaning the records. You admit
> that you use nothing but spit on initial cleaning and then have to rinse
> the record with distilled water. It is not working. If you still have
> stuff in the grooves after cleaning it is not working.
>
> Greg Butler--- You sound a bit obsessive Michael with obviously lots of
> time on your hands - when you are dealing with as many records as I do a
> deep clean valet using processes that might damage the records is not a
> realistic option. I suppose it just depends upon how OCD you are.
>
> Michael Biel--- SPIT? How much saliva do you actually produce if you
> clean a thousand records a month with spit?
>
> Greg Butler--- I seee it is the idea of using spit that revolts you Mr
> Monk
>
> Michael Biel--- It doesn't revolt me, it is STUPID.
>
> Mark Cederquist--- Everyone's got their own particular method of
> cleaning 78's.
>
> Michael Biel--- Everybody thought you were joking when you mentioned it,
> just like the joke about using chicken soup. Or 40 grit sandpaper. But
> it is becoming a sad fact that you are serious about this, and that this
> is going to be how you are known worldwide -- the guy who cleans his
> records with saliva.
>
> Greg Butler--- You do sound a bit like a cracked record Michael
> obsessing about this subject as if your way is the only way! My
> philosophy is if you can avoid any sort of aggresive solvent on these
> precious records you should - and a natural enzymatic cleaner works for
> me no matter how much you find it unpleasant.
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> So, my question to the ARSC Technical Committee and to the Library of
> Congress group which gave a presentation on cleaning lacquer discs, is
> SPIT a good cleaning fluid for shellac 78s???
>
> Mike Biel  [log in to unmask]
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager