I do like my Squeezebox Touch, but it only does 96/24 and lower. I have a lot of 192/24. It won't
down-convert on the fly. Meanwhile, using my laptop USB connected to my Benchmark DAC1/Pre (which
only does up to 96/24 via the USB) works fine because Foobar2000 down-converts on the fly and I
can't hear a damn bit of difference except maybe very subtle things in excellent recordings thru
Where the Squeezebox Touch really excels is interwebs-based radio streams. I can find just about any
stream, and it's easy to add to favorites. It also runs Pandora and Spotify. You can also do all
this via an iPhone and either a line input or an iPhone-to-SPDIF dock, and a variety of free apps.
-- Tom Fine
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carl Pultz" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Mac Mini as a HD digital music server
> Interesting that he has not set his DAC2 for USB v.2. It would then accept
> 192K transfers. With what he's talking about, I'd call the Mini a source
> rather than a server. A server is something that hooks across a network,
> unless you're talking about a daemon, as in a unix X server or something
> like that. But IT lingo is infinitely "extensible" and instantly confused.
> An example of a media server is a thing I set up to access my
> computer-stored tunes on my garage hifi. It was prompted by the purchase of
> an Internet radio, a Grace Digital Mondo. It looks like a radio, has a
> built-in speaker, but the only signal it receives is that from a wireless
> hotspot, like from a home wireless Internet router. Works very nicely for
> streaming radio stations, which can be stored in one of 10 presets for
> instant connection. Well, as instant as the speed of your wireless, network,
> broadband, etc, etc. allows. But even with my old Linksys G, it works fine
> within range with a strong signal. In addition to streams, it will also
> access files on the local network, audio up to 24/96. This is where a server
> comes in.
> The Mondo keeps an ear out for a network service called DLNA (via UPnP).
> Conveniently, Windows 7 computers run this by default, though you wouldn't
> know it until you run something that speaks DLNA - like Windows Media
> Player. It's not a routed protocol, so your neighbors won't see it unless
> they're using your network. This can be fun if you have a multi-computer
> household. Micky came out the other day and heard a belly dance tune
> playing. "I didn't know you had that," she said. "I don't," I replied. "It's
> on your computer." Mondo found it there. Mondo like belly.
> Where this gets a little complicated (it has to - because, computers) is
> when you expect a good, navigable index of the library to show up on your
> device. That comes from the meta-data of the music files, and if they are
> incomplete, inconsistent, wrong, or cryptic, so will be the list displayed
> by Mondo. I've been using a computer as a source for years, so I've kept up
> with the tagging chore. Whenever I rip, download, or create files, I correct
> their stats: Genre, Title, Artist, etc. There are free-ware tools for this,
> but I bought a program that Windows (or MAC or linux) users should consider.
> JRiver Media Center. One of the best $50 I've spent. It's a full-service
> media player app, video and audio, which also has excellent tag editing and
> library display features. It rips like a champ - fewer errors than EAC or
> dbpoweramp in my tests.
> But wait there's more. Media Center has its own DLNA server, one which
> supports all that meta-data. Not all implementations do, such as the useless
> one on my NAS box. I have MC running on my office machine - always on. I
> point it to the music library, which can be stored on that, or another
> machine via a shared folder. Mondo sees it complete, as does other media
> apps in the house. MC also picks up all the other DLNA libraries on the home
> network (we have several) and can serve them up, too. So, while Mondo sees
> all the computers that are advertising their wares, the MC server gathers
> them all in one connection and library function. So, Micky's belly music was
> transferring from her computer but was identified by the server running on
> my computer. A distributed services environment.
> Mondo's display is adequate, but no more than that, and navigation is clunky
> as you have only a spin-and-push selector and a back button to move around
> with. Tragically, you can't use the presets to remember servers. But with a
> little practice and a few oaths, I've got used to it. Sound quality? Grainy
> out of the box, it has smoothed out after a few weeks and actually supports
> a decent soundstage. If you use the headphone output to drive an amp, you
> have the use of the remote volume control. It's perfect for my ST-35 clone.
> The RCA outputs are better for the Lepai amp I'm playing with (20 W/ch, $22
> from Parts Express).
> I've probably managed to make this sound more complicated than it is. None
> of it is technical, really, and if you like to tinker, this stuff rewards
> you. Not as easy as an Apple/Airport system, but a lot less costly. Mondo
> isn't the only option; Grace Digital makes others. If you find a Logitech
> Squeezebox Touch at a decent price, grab it. Wish I had before it was
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tom Fine
> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 1:27 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [ARSCLIST] Mac Mini as a HD digital music server
> There was some discussion here a week or two ago about building a HD music
> server ...
> -- Tom Fine