On 7/24/14, 1:27 PM, Denenberg, Ray wrote:
> (I don't think we've thought much about providing identifiers for titles.)
I hope you *have* because they are in your data ;-)
bf:workTitle <http://bibframe.org/resources/Ahx1405278232/1706459title7> ;
<http://bibframe.org/resources/Ahx1405278232/1706459title7>
bf:titleValue "The adventures of Tom Sawyer" ;
a bf:Title .
bf:instanceTitle <http://bibframe.org/resources/Ahx1405278232/1706459title33>
<http://bibframe.org/resources/Ahx1405278232/1706459title33>
bf:titleValue "The adventures of Tom Sawyer" ;
a bf:Title .
Those are from a BF record, converted from MARC.[1] I found them rather
odd, myself. It makes some sense to give identifiers to work titles,
although generally the work title alone does not identify a work. But I
think that this is actually evidence for a discussion that we have not
had yet on the massive level of indirection (blank and non-blank nodes)
in BIBFRAME.
kc
[1] http://bibframe.org/resources/Ahx1405278232/1706459.rdf
--
Karen Coyle
[log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet
|