Sometimes I forget how effective a tool the internet is for suppressing
indicators of sarcasm.
Yes we have similar requests to
On 07/18/2014 12:36 PM, LAURA DAWSON wrote:
> Actor/actress career prospects. At ISNI, wešve received requests to take
> birth dates down because of that reason.
> On 7/17/14, 7:59 PM, "Stuart Yeates" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> LCNA / VIAF dates of birth turn out to be surprisingly useful for
>> writing wikipedia biographies of living people.
>> Almost makes you wonder whether there's a reason we shouldn't be
>> plastering people's dates of birth all over the public internet.
>> On 07/18/2014 10:14 AM, Karen Coyle wrote:
>>> Wow. Am I now glad that my LCNA entry doesn't include birth date :-). I
>>> doubt if the entry has ever had such exposure.
>>> On 7/17/14, 1:27 PM, LeVan,Ralph wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum
>>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Pilsk, Suzanne
>>>> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 3:54 PM
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: Re: [BIBFRAME] BibFrame and Linked Data: Identifiers
>>>>> So Ralph, are you saying the IRI for Karen should be
>>>> Well, the hash stuff at the end is gratuitous decoration, but yes,
>>>> that's the correct URI. http://viaf.org/viaf/195531823 (without
>>>> trailing slash or hash comment) is the ID for Karen as a
>>>> RealWorldObject and returns a 303 redirect to that URI with a trailing
>>>> slash, pointing to our page about her.