On 7/31/14, 2:43 PM, JOHN C ATTIG wrote:
> I don't think you can get away with a choice between atomized data without internal relationships and aggregations of literal text.
John, it appears that at the moment BIBFRAME supports both atomized data
(at least partially) and the original literal text. Does that assuage
your concerns? And also, can you give examples of uses beyond display
that you think would be appropriate to this data?
[log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net