LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME Archives

BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME  July 2014

BIBFRAME July 2014

Subject:

Re: The headings as strings assumption

From:

Philip Schreur <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 10 Jul 2014 18:34:46 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (52 lines)

Karen,

Exactly my question ... I don' think the changes would be that dramatic 
but whatever they are, we need to make them. The Program for Cooperative 
Cataloging will be re-envisaging its future in a linked-data environment 
at a special meeting this November.  I think we all realize that this 
change is necessary.  Authorities are a huge part of the agenda and I'm 
sure these changes to authorities will be a part of the discussion.  We 
are also proposing to allow the use of identifiers from multiple 
authority sources (VIAF, ISNI, etc. as needed) in bibliographic records. 
This would require the addition of identifiers to bibliographic 
records.  So ... change is afoot ... I'm very happy to see so much on 
the table ...

Philip Schreur
Stanford University


On 7/10/14 5:37 PM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> Adrian Pohl has a very informative blog post about the use of 
> identifiers in authorities, stimulated by his reading of Rob 
> Sanderson's document:
> http://www.uebertext.org/2014/07/name-authority-files-linked-data.htm
>
> The use of authorities to represent "preferred name" strings (as 
> opposed to representing identified *entities* who have a preferred 
> display form for human usage) appears to be an American anomaly - at 
> least among the libraries he mentions.
>
> One question we could ask ourselves, because we do have identifiers 
> for the things described in authority records, is how feasible it 
> would be to transform LC authorities to identify an entity  rather 
> than a string. Is this a few tweaks, a total re-do, or something in 
> between? My gut feeling is that it would be a behind-the-scenes change 
> that wouldn't affect cataloger usage. Does anyone else see it that way?
>
> I also wonder if we really must resign ourselves to using strings in 
> our future data because "that's what's in the MARC records." There are 
> authority control services that match the strings in bibliographic 
> records to authority records in order to update the bibliographic 
> data. That same process should be able to add authority identifiers to 
> the bibliographic records for the same matches. In fact, there are 
> vendors who will do this today. I'm sure that matching isn't 100%, but 
> I suspect that having identifiers for name authorities in our 
> bibliographic records is much less of an effort than converting our 
> data and systems to BIBFRAME. It seems short-sighted not to begin this 
> process today, before the death of MARC, rather than carrying the 
> strings forward to a new bibliographic model.
>
> kc
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager