If that is the consensus (and such was my observation of the thread) then the marc2bibframe tool could be updated. (It seems currently to generate URI-identified resources for bf:Identifiers, not blank nodes.)
Kevin et al.-- I would be happy to help with that.
The University of Virginia Library
On Jul 16, 2014, at 5:39 PM, "Denenberg, Ray" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I think the advice is:
> (1) don't use a URI to identify a bf:Identifier. Treat it as a blank node.
> (2) Only a non-URI identifier (e.g. isbn) should be treated a bf:Identifier. (I.e. a URI should not be treated as a bf:Identifer. Thus the property bf:uri should be eliminated.)
> I think there is consensus on this, someone correct me if Iím wrong.