It may be true that a normalized RDBBS can be mapped to RDF, but the opposite isn't necessarily true. Reality doesn't seem to be that tidy. This disturbing fact seems to be why people obsess about "use cases" and ignore the enlightened case of "unexpected reuse".
> On Jul 26, 2014, at 5:30 AM, "Gordon Dunsire" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> In any case, a normalized RDBMS is a very good fit indeed with the RDF world; see, for example, the work of the W3C RDB2RDF Working Group .