LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PCCLIST Archives


PCCLIST Archives

PCCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PCCLIST Home

PCCLIST Home

PCCLIST  July 2014

PCCLIST July 2014

Subject:

Re: Differentiating titles proper, 3

From:

"Adam L. Schiff" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:25:07 -0700

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (115 lines)

I would go with option 3 as the most logical, regardless of whether the preferred title is identical to the preferred title of a different work by Dillingham.  But if forced to pick another option, I would go with option 7, either of the first two choices there.

Adam Schiff
University of Washington Libraries

On Tue, 29 Jul 2014, Bokow, Martin S. wrote:

> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:42:09 -0400
> From: "Bokow, Martin S." <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Differentiating titles proper, 3
> 
> One final example. Please see the following resource, and tell us how you would treat it and record the title proper:
>
> http://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo44849   (This will be entered under Dr. Dillingham as the creator. There are about 10 different works (their content differs) entered under Dr. Dillingham with titles beginning with "Aviation safety." FYI, there are also about 18 different works entered under corporate body (GAO) with titles beginning with "Aviation safety.")
>
> 1. Aviation safety. $p Status of recommendations to improve FAA's certification and approval processes.
> 2. Aviation safety - status of recommendations to improve FAA's certification and approval processes.
> 3. Aviation safety : $b status of recommendations to improve FAA's certification and approval processes.   (This creates the need for a "uniform title.")
> 4. Status of recommendations to improve FAA's certification and approval processes : $b aviation safety.
> 5. Status of recommendations to improve FAA's certification and approval processes.
>                Series: Aviation safety
> 6. Status of recommendations to improve FAA's certification and approval processes
>                Variant title: Aviation safety - status of recommendations to improve FAA's certification and approval processes
>                Note: At head of title: Aviation safety
> 7. A variation of no. 2, such as:
> Aviation safety: status of recommendations to improve FAA's certification and approval processes.
> Aviation safety--status of recommendations to improve FAA's certification and approval processes.
> Aviation safety, status of recommendations to improve FAA's certification and approval processes.
>
> I think that covers most of the possibilities!
> Marty Bokow
>
> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Hostage
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 5:46 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Differentiating titles proper, 2
>
> I don't think there's any rule that says you have to take the first information you find as the title proper.  "Other title information can include any phrase appearing with a title proper that is indicative of: the character, contents, etc., of the resource, or the motives for, or occasion of, its production, publication, etc." (RDA 2.3.4.1).  I think you can make a good argument for option 4.
>
> ------------------------------------------
> John Hostage
> Senior Continuing Resources Cataloger //
> Harvard Library--Information and Technical Services //
> Langdell Hall 194 //
> Cambridge, MA 02138
> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> +(1)(617) 495-3974 (voice)
> +(1)(617) 496-4409 (fax)
>
> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bokow, Martin S.
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 13:51
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: [PCCLIST] Differentiating titles proper, 2
>
> All,
>
> Thanks very much for your input. For those who are new to this specific thread, please see my original message below, which explains the "problem."
>
> My next 2 examples are fairly straightforward. Please see the title pages for the following 2 resources, and tell us how you would treat these and record the titles proper:
>
>
> http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/gpo46212/1-84886_FSPLT3_1374250.pdf   (For argument's sake, please take the title from the cover, enter as "title main entry," and just ignore the text beginning with "Moose Creek" (or add "[etc.]"). I want to focus on the specific problem, which is that there are hundreds of different works, many by the same agency, that begin with "Draft environmental impact statement" using this same presentation.)
>
>
> http://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo15126   (title panel in top left-rotate 180 degrees & zoom in)    (there are hundreds of different works, many by the same agency, that begin with "Motor vehicle use map" using this same presentation. "United States. Forest Service" would be the creator of this cartographic work.)
>
> I see 4 options for the titles proper of these (below, where I use "Draft environmental impact statement" as an example, you may also substitute "Motor vehicle use map"):
> 1. Transcribe as given, with a comma or dash after "Draft environmental impact statement." Record a variant title beginning with the specific area/project/etc.
> 2. Begin the title with the specific area/project/etc., use the old "At head of title: Draft environmental impact statement" note, and record a variant title "Draft environmental impact statement, Clear Creek Integrated Restoration Project" (or use a dash instead of comma)
> 3. Make "Draft environmental impact statement (United States. Forest Service)" a series.
> 4. Can "Draft environmental impact statement" be considered "other title information," and may it therefore be transposed to the end?
> 5. Draft environmental impact statement. $p Clear Creek Integrated Restoration Project, with a 246 for Clear Creek Integrated Restoration Project
>
> I'll post our decisions at the end of all examples and feedback.
>
> Marty Bokow  |  Librarian (Database Integrity & Authority Control)  |  Library Services & Content Management  |  ph 202.512.2010 x 31120
> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> GPO | OFFICIAL | DIGITAL | SECURE  |  732 North Capitol Street, NW, Washington, DC 20401
> Connect to us  http://www.gpo.gov<http://www.gpo.gov/>  |  http://www.facebook.com/USGPO  |  http://www.youtube.com/user/gpoprinter  |  http://twitter.com/#!/USGPO
> Find Government information  http://www.fdsys.gov<http://www.fdsys.gov/>  |  http://bookstore.gpo.gov<http://bookstore.gpo.gov/>  |  http://govbooktalk.gpo.gov<http://govbooktalk.gpo.gov/>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> July 24, 2014
> Dear collective wisdom,
>
> When transcribing the title of a resource (RDA 2.3), there is a longstanding tendency to transcribe the main title as the title proper, and the remainder of the title, which usually appears in a smaller font, as "other title information." This can result in different works having the same authorized access point (AAP), creating the need to distinguish the preferred titles by additional elements - what we all know as uniform titles. GPO is seeking advice on ways to differentiate such titles in the title proper of the resource (which determines the preferred title) when possible, in order to avoid the creation of unnecessary uniform titles. In considering the examples that I would like to offer, another consideration arises - do the multiple resources actually embody different works (and do they need to be distinguished)? A model of this concept appears in the figure at the bottom of page 4 of: http://www.loc.gov/cds/downloads/FRBR.PDF. I'm basing my thinking on RDA and the !
 LC-PCC PSs 6.0, 6.27.1.9, 6.27.1.5 (especially the bottom text and example), and 6.27.3.
>
> I have about 5 examples total, but I'll start with one. Please see the title pages for the following 3 resources, and tell us (on or off the list) how you would treat these and record the title proper of each:
>
> http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS105990  (2.3.1.7.1?   LC-PCC PS 2.3.1.7?)
> http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS121574  (2.3.1.7.1?   LC-PCC PS 2.3.1.7?)
> http://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo44686   (If you would just treat this executive summary as accompanying material or as one item of a multipart, we would like to know that. But, since it was separately issued, please consider also cataloging it as a separate expression/work/manifestation, unless you consider the comprehensive title to be a multipart and would only use a single comprehensive description for all 3 of these links. Is a summary a different work (J.2.2) or expression (J.3.2), and, if cataloged separately, should its AAP be distinguished from that of the full work? Or, for practical purposes, can the summary use the same AAP as the full report, so as to initially collocate, then subsequently be differentiated by subtitle or other displayed elements?)
>
> Just one more note-in all the examples that I may submit, please do not consider that an RDA record has no conflict with an AACR2 record because it considers the first-named author to be the creator, while the A2 record does not. Just assume that the A2 record will be recoded to match the RDA record.
>
> If you're on vacation (the list is very quiet ...), we'd still like to hear from you when you return.
>
> Thanks very much,
> Marty Bokow  |  Librarian (Database Integrity & Authority Control)  |  Library Services & Content Management  |  ph 202.512.2010 x 31120
>

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Adam L. Schiff
Principal Cataloger
University of Washington Libraries
Box 352900
Seattle, WA 98195-2900
(206) 543-8409
(206) 685-8782 fax
[log in to unmask]
http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager