I would go with option 3 as the most logical, regardless of whether the preferred title is identical to the preferred title of a different work by Dillingham. But if forced to pick another option, I would go with option 7, either of the first two choices there.
Adam Schiff
University of Washington Libraries
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014, Bokow, Martin S. wrote:
> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:42:09 -0400
> From: "Bokow, Martin S." <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Differentiating titles proper, 3
>
> One final example. Please see the following resource, and tell us how you would treat it and record the title proper:
>
> http://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo44849 (This will be entered under Dr. Dillingham as the creator. There are about 10 different works (their content differs) entered under Dr. Dillingham with titles beginning with "Aviation safety." FYI, there are also about 18 different works entered under corporate body (GAO) with titles beginning with "Aviation safety.")
>
> 1. Aviation safety. $p Status of recommendations to improve FAA's certification and approval processes.
> 2. Aviation safety - status of recommendations to improve FAA's certification and approval processes.
> 3. Aviation safety : $b status of recommendations to improve FAA's certification and approval processes. (This creates the need for a "uniform title.")
> 4. Status of recommendations to improve FAA's certification and approval processes : $b aviation safety.
> 5. Status of recommendations to improve FAA's certification and approval processes.
> Series: Aviation safety
> 6. Status of recommendations to improve FAA's certification and approval processes
> Variant title: Aviation safety - status of recommendations to improve FAA's certification and approval processes
> Note: At head of title: Aviation safety
> 7. A variation of no. 2, such as:
> Aviation safety: status of recommendations to improve FAA's certification and approval processes.
> Aviation safety--status of recommendations to improve FAA's certification and approval processes.
> Aviation safety, status of recommendations to improve FAA's certification and approval processes.
>
> I think that covers most of the possibilities!
> Marty Bokow
>
> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Hostage
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 5:46 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Differentiating titles proper, 2
>
> I don't think there's any rule that says you have to take the first information you find as the title proper. "Other title information can include any phrase appearing with a title proper that is indicative of: the character, contents, etc., of the resource, or the motives for, or occasion of, its production, publication, etc." (RDA 2.3.4.1). I think you can make a good argument for option 4.
>
> ------------------------------------------
> John Hostage
> Senior Continuing Resources Cataloger //
> Harvard Library--Information and Technical Services //
> Langdell Hall 194 //
> Cambridge, MA 02138
> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> +(1)(617) 495-3974 (voice)
> +(1)(617) 496-4409 (fax)
>
> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bokow, Martin S.
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 13:51
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: [PCCLIST] Differentiating titles proper, 2
>
> All,
>
> Thanks very much for your input. For those who are new to this specific thread, please see my original message below, which explains the "problem."
>
> My next 2 examples are fairly straightforward. Please see the title pages for the following 2 resources, and tell us how you would treat these and record the titles proper:
>
>
> http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/gpo46212/1-84886_FSPLT3_1374250.pdf (For argument's sake, please take the title from the cover, enter as "title main entry," and just ignore the text beginning with "Moose Creek" (or add "[etc.]"). I want to focus on the specific problem, which is that there are hundreds of different works, many by the same agency, that begin with "Draft environmental impact statement" using this same presentation.)
>
>
> http://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo15126 (title panel in top left-rotate 180 degrees & zoom in) (there are hundreds of different works, many by the same agency, that begin with "Motor vehicle use map" using this same presentation. "United States. Forest Service" would be the creator of this cartographic work.)
>
> I see 4 options for the titles proper of these (below, where I use "Draft environmental impact statement" as an example, you may also substitute "Motor vehicle use map"):
> 1. Transcribe as given, with a comma or dash after "Draft environmental impact statement." Record a variant title beginning with the specific area/project/etc.
> 2. Begin the title with the specific area/project/etc., use the old "At head of title: Draft environmental impact statement" note, and record a variant title "Draft environmental impact statement, Clear Creek Integrated Restoration Project" (or use a dash instead of comma)
> 3. Make "Draft environmental impact statement (United States. Forest Service)" a series.
> 4. Can "Draft environmental impact statement" be considered "other title information," and may it therefore be transposed to the end?
> 5. Draft environmental impact statement. $p Clear Creek Integrated Restoration Project, with a 246 for Clear Creek Integrated Restoration Project
>
> I'll post our decisions at the end of all examples and feedback.
>
> Marty Bokow | Librarian (Database Integrity & Authority Control) | Library Services & Content Management | ph 202.512.2010 x 31120
> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> GPO | OFFICIAL | DIGITAL | SECURE | 732 North Capitol Street, NW, Washington, DC 20401
> Connect to us http://www.gpo.gov<http://www.gpo.gov/> | http://www.facebook.com/USGPO | http://www.youtube.com/user/gpoprinter | http://twitter.com/#!/USGPO
> Find Government information http://www.fdsys.gov<http://www.fdsys.gov/> | http://bookstore.gpo.gov<http://bookstore.gpo.gov/> | http://govbooktalk.gpo.gov<http://govbooktalk.gpo.gov/>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> July 24, 2014
> Dear collective wisdom,
>
> When transcribing the title of a resource (RDA 2.3), there is a longstanding tendency to transcribe the main title as the title proper, and the remainder of the title, which usually appears in a smaller font, as "other title information." This can result in different works having the same authorized access point (AAP), creating the need to distinguish the preferred titles by additional elements - what we all know as uniform titles. GPO is seeking advice on ways to differentiate such titles in the title proper of the resource (which determines the preferred title) when possible, in order to avoid the creation of unnecessary uniform titles. In considering the examples that I would like to offer, another consideration arises - do the multiple resources actually embody different works (and do they need to be distinguished)? A model of this concept appears in the figure at the bottom of page 4 of: http://www.loc.gov/cds/downloads/FRBR.PDF. I'm basing my thinking on RDA and the !
LC-PCC PSs 6.0, 6.27.1.9, 6.27.1.5 (especially the bottom text and example), and 6.27.3.
>
> I have about 5 examples total, but I'll start with one. Please see the title pages for the following 3 resources, and tell us (on or off the list) how you would treat these and record the title proper of each:
>
> http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS105990 (2.3.1.7.1? LC-PCC PS 2.3.1.7?)
> http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS121574 (2.3.1.7.1? LC-PCC PS 2.3.1.7?)
> http://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo44686 (If you would just treat this executive summary as accompanying material or as one item of a multipart, we would like to know that. But, since it was separately issued, please consider also cataloging it as a separate expression/work/manifestation, unless you consider the comprehensive title to be a multipart and would only use a single comprehensive description for all 3 of these links. Is a summary a different work (J.2.2) or expression (J.3.2), and, if cataloged separately, should its AAP be distinguished from that of the full work? Or, for practical purposes, can the summary use the same AAP as the full report, so as to initially collocate, then subsequently be differentiated by subtitle or other displayed elements?)
>
> Just one more note-in all the examples that I may submit, please do not consider that an RDA record has no conflict with an AACR2 record because it considers the first-named author to be the creator, while the A2 record does not. Just assume that the A2 record will be recoded to match the RDA record.
>
> If you're on vacation (the list is very quiet ...), we'd still like to hear from you when you return.
>
> Thanks very much,
> Marty Bokow | Librarian (Database Integrity & Authority Control) | Library Services & Content Management | ph 202.512.2010 x 31120
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Adam L. Schiff
Principal Cataloger
University of Washington Libraries
Box 352900
Seattle, WA 98195-2900
(206) 543-8409
(206) 685-8782 fax
[log in to unmask]
http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|