LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PCCLIST Archives


PCCLIST Archives

PCCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PCCLIST Home

PCCLIST Home

PCCLIST  July 2014

PCCLIST July 2014

Subject:

Re: Differentiating titles proper

From:

"Adam L. Schiff" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 25 Jul 2014 12:49:19 -0700

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (321 lines)

The RDA element that is being applied here is Other Distinguishing 
Characteristic of the Work.  It's not required to be in the language of 
the work.

6.6.1.1 Other distinguishing characteristic of the work is a 
characteristic other than form of work, date of work, or place of origin 
of the work. It serves to differentiate a work from another work with the 
same title or from the name of a person, family, or corporate body.

6.6.1.2 Take information on other distinguishing characteristics of the 
work from any source.

6.6.1.3 Record other distinguishing characteristics of the work.

Record other distinguishing characteristics of the work as separate 
elements, as parts of access points, or as both. For instructions on 
recording other distinguishing characteristics of the work as part of the 
authorized access point, see 6.27.1.9.

For example, consider these works that have qualifiers that are different 
from the language of the title of the work:

Conference proceedings and monographs (Polska Akademia Nauk. Stacja 
Naukowa w Wiedniu)

Languages of Asia and Africa (Institut vostokovedeniia (Akademiia nauk 
SSSR))

Hera of Samos (Musee du Louvre)

Bloch, Augustyn. Gilgamesz (Ballet version)

Bloch, Augustyn. $t Gilgamesz (Concert version)

Catholic Church. Rota Romana. Decisiones Aegidii Bellemerae (Long 
version)

Cordoba (Spain). Fuero (Latin version)

Cordoba (Spain). Fuero (Spanish version)

Croissant (Middle French prose version)

Da zang jing (Koryo version)

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, 1762-1814. Wissenschaftslehre 1804 (1st version)

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, 1762-1814. Wissenschaftslehre 1804 (2nd version)

Purgatoire de saint Patrice (Old French prose version)

Theodore bar Konai, active 8th century-9th century. Liber scholiorum 
(Seert version)

Theodore bar Konai, active 8th century-9th century. Liber scholiorum 
(Urmiah version)


Most of these are not yet coded as RDA, but they are all valid access 
points in RDA I think and you can see that the language of the qualifier 
may not be the same as the language of the title of the work.  Other 
Distinguishing Characteristic of Work can be basically anything that 
serves to distinguish one work from another when form of work, date of 
work, or place of work is not sufficient or appropriate to differentiate 
the works.

Adam Schiff


On Fri, 25 Jul 2014, Stephen Early wrote:

> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 18:22:30 +0000
> From: Stephen Early <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Differentiating titles proper
> 
> I think this is an interesting exercise, so forgive me if I put it further to the test (best way to see if something actually will work in the field or if it needs to be improved upon):
>
> Regarding your first choice, something like the following?
>
> 100 1_ Black, Alison Rebeck, $e author.
> 240 10 $a Evaluation of enhanced academic instruction in after-school programs (Findings after the first year of implementation)
> 245 14 The evaluation of enhanced academic instruction in after-school programs : $b findings after the first year of implementation
>
> Second choice (shorter, but looks like it requires more cataloger judgment than the first):
>
> 100 1_ Black, Alison Rebeck, $e author.
> 240 10 $a Evaluation of enhanced academic instruction in after-school programs (First year report)
> 245 14 The evaluation of enhanced academic instruction in after-school programs : $b findings after the first year of implementation
>
> Regarding the second choice solution approach: what if the three titles were published in the same year, the language was Dutch, and your Dutch knowledge was less than fluent (I presume the qualifier should be in Dutch as well? Or is there flexibility in an English based catalog?) (I wish I had a real world example at my fingertips, but I know they're out there :-) )
>
>
>
> Stephen T. Early
> Cataloger
> Center for Research Libraries
> 6050 S. Kenwood
> Chicago, IL  60637
> 773-955-4545 x326
> [log in to unmask]
> CRL website: www.crl.edu
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Adam L. Schiff
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 12:15 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Differentiating titles proper
>
> Stephen,
>
> If all were in the same year, then I would have probably used the subtitles as the qualifiers.  Or perhaps (First year report) and (Final report).  The executive summary solution of mine would not be changed.  It is definitely a part of the final report in my mind.
>
> Adam
>
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2014, Stephen Early wrote:
>
>> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:55:48 +0000
>> From: Stephen Early <[log in to unmask]>
>> Reply-To: Program for Cooperative Cataloging
>> <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: Differentiating titles proper
>>
>> I agree with Kevin on this as well.
>> My only beef with 245 $p is that it doesn't search properly in Connexion's "sca ti=" browse search - although it does search properly with "sca tiw" (but the latter doesn't search properly on $b - which means you're out of luck entirely attempting a browse search on a 245 with both $p and $b text). But then that's a Connexion problem that could have been fixed years ago when I complained about it then and likely a whole different discussion.
>> So, despite that quibble, I'm going with Kevin.
>>
>> But to give Adam's solution its due, let me ask:
>>
>> Adam, if all three reports had been issued in the same year, what qualifier would you then have used in your 240's?
>>
>> Stephen T. Early
>> Cataloger
>> Center for Research Libraries
>> 6050 S. Kenwood
>> Chicago, IL  60637
>> 773-955-4545 x326
>> [log in to unmask]
>> CRL website: www.crl.edu
>>
>>
>> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kevin M Randall
>> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 4:38 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Differentiating titles proper
>>
>> Marty:  This is the way I would code the titles proper for the resources in question.
>>
>>                245 04 $a The evaluation of enhanced academic
>> instruction in after-school programs. $p Findings  after the first
>> year of implementation
>>
>>                245 04 $a The evaluation of enhanced academic
>> instruction in after-school programs. $p Final report
>>
>>                245 04 $a The evaluation of enhanced academic
>> instruction in after-school programs. $p Final report, executive
>> summary
>>
>> In my experience, it seems that serials catalogers typically are much more ready to accept "subtitle-looking" information as an integral part of the title, whereas monographic catalogers seem to be quite reluctant to do so (and I've never been able to figure out why).  Thus we end up with so many things like:
>>
>>                245 00 $a Movies : $b 1930-1939
>>
>> instead of the more logical:
>>
>>                245 00 $a Movies, 1930-1939
>>
>> (made up example, but *quite* typical, and a big pet peeve of mine...)
>>
>> Kevin M. Randall
>> Principal Serials Cataloger
>> Northwestern University Library
>> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> (847) 491-2939
>>
>> Proudly wearing the sensible shoes since 1978!
>>
>>
>> **********************
>>
>> Adam Schiff wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Marty,
>>
>>
>>
>> I think the findings after the first year and the final report are separate works, and I would use the year of issuance as the qualifier to distinguish them.
>>
>>
>>
>> 100 1_ Black, Alison Rebeck, $e author.
>>
>> 240 10 Evaluation of enhanced academic instruction in after-school
>> programs (2008)
>>
>> 245 14 The evaluation of enhanced academic instruction in after-school programs : $b findings after the first year of implementation / $c .....
>>
>>
>>
>> 100 1_ Black, Alison Rebeck, $e author.
>>
>> 240 10 Evaluation of enhanced academic instruction in after-school
>> programs (2009)
>>
>> 245 14 The evaluation of enhanced academic instruction in after-school programs : $b final report / $c .....
>>
>>
>>
>> I don't think you could say that these are two expressions of a single work.  They don't refer to themselves as versions or editions of the same thing, and the content is likely significantly different.  Instead of date of work to distinguish the second from the first, you could use other distinguishing characteristic and use the qualifier (Final report) in the second record.  I suppose you could also use the subtitle as a qualifier instead of date in the first record.  In these two cases, however, dates seem to be the most succinct way to differentiate these two works.
>>
>>
>>
>> Now although the executive summary was issued separately, I think you
>> can treat this as a part of the second work and apply RDA 6.2.2.9.1
>> and
>>
>> 6.27.2.2:
>>
>>
>>
>> 100 1_ Black, Alison Rebeck, $e author.
>>
>> 240 10 Evaluation of enhanced academic instruction in after-school
>> programs (2009). $p Executive summary
>>
>> 245 14 The evaluation of enhanced academic instruction in after-school programs : $b final report. $p Executive summary / $c .....
>>
>>
>>
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>> Adam L. Schiff
>>
>> Principal Cataloger
>>
>> University of Washington Libraries
>>
>> Box 352900
>>
>> Seattle, WA 98195-2900
>>
>> (206) 543-8409
>>
>> (206) 685-8782 fax
>>
>> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>
>> http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff
>>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> ******************
>>
>> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bokow, Martin S.
>> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 3:58 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: [PCCLIST] Differentiating titles proper
>>
>> Dear collective wisdom,
>>
>> When transcribing the title of a resource (RDA 2.3), there is a longstanding tendency to transcribe the main title as the title proper, and the remainder of the title, which usually appears in a smaller font, as "other title information." This can result in different works having the same authorized access point (AAP), creating the need to distinguish the preferred titles by additional elements - what we all know as uniform titles. GPO is seeking advice on ways to differentiate such titles in the title proper of the resource (which determines the preferred title) when possible, in order to avoid the creation of unnecessary uniform titles. In considering the examples that I would like to offer, another consideration arises - do the multiple resources actually embody different works (and do they need to be distinguished)? A model of this concept appears in the figure at the bottom of page 4 of: http://www.loc.gov/cds/downloads/FRBR.PDF. I'm basing my thinking on RDA and the!
  !
>
> LC-PCC PSs 6.0, 6.27.1.9, 6.27.1.5 (especially the bottom text and example), and 6.27.3.
>>
>> I have about 5 examples total, but I'll start with one. Please see the title pages for the following 3 resources, and tell us (on or off the list) how you would treat these and record the title proper of each:
>>
>> http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS105990  (2.3.1.7.1?   LC-PCC PS 2.3.1.7?)
>> http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS121574  (2.3.1.7.1?   LC-PCC PS 2.3.1.7?)
>> http://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo44686   (If you would just treat this executive summary as accompanying material or as one item of a multipart, we would like to know that. But, since it was separately issued, please consider also cataloging it as a separate expression/work/manifestation, unless you consider the comprehensive title to be a multipart and would only use a single comprehensive description for all 3 of these links. Is a summary a different work (J.2.2) or expression (J.3.2), and, if cataloged separately, should its AAP be distinguished from that of the full work? Or, for practical purposes, can the summary use the same AAP as the full report, so as to initially collocate, then subsequently be differentiated by subtitle or other displayed elements?)
>>
>> Just one more note-in all the examples that I may submit, please do not consider that an RDA record has no conflict with an AACR2 record because it considers the first-named author to be the creator, while the A2 record does not. Just assume that the A2 record will be recoded to match the RDA record.
>>
>> If you're on vacation (the list is very quiet ...), we'd still like to hear from you when you return.
>>
>> Thanks very much,
>> Marty Bokow  |  Librarian (Database Integrity & Authority Control)  |
>> Library Services & Content Management  |  ph 202.512.2010 x 31120
>> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> GPO | OFFICIAL | DIGITAL | SECURE  |  732 North Capitol Street, NW,
>> Washington, DC 20401 Connect to us
>> http://www.gpo.gov<http://www.gpo.gov/>  |
>> http://www.facebook.com/USGPO  |
>> http://www.youtube.com/user/gpoprinter  |  http://twitter.com/#!/USGPO
>> Find Government information
>> http://www.fdsys.gov<http://www.fdsys.gov/>  |
>> http://bookstore.gpo.gov<http://bookstore.gpo.gov/>  |
>> http://govbooktalk.gpo.gov<http://govbooktalk.gpo.gov/>
>>
>>
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Adam L. Schiff
> Principal Cataloger
> University of Washington Libraries
> Box 352900
> Seattle, WA 98195-2900
> (206) 543-8409
> (206) 685-8782 fax
> [log in to unmask]
> http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Adam L. Schiff
Principal Cataloger
University of Washington Libraries
Box 352900
Seattle, WA 98195-2900
(206) 543-8409
(206) 685-8782 fax
[log in to unmask]
http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager