LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME Archives

BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME  August 2014

BIBFRAME August 2014

Subject:

Re: Proposal to handle "Providers" differently

From:

"Ford, Kevin" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 1 Aug 2014 10:26:09 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (53 lines)

Comments in-line.

Yours,
Kevin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod
> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 7:36 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [BIBFRAME] Proposal to handle "Providers" differently
> 
> Kevin said:
> 
> >Standardization is entirely appropriate, and to be desired, for the 2nd
> >of these.  But it is not at all appropriate for the 1st.
> 
> If we are following RDA, it now allows the provision of jurisdiction if lacking
> on the item, as from the outset it allowed provision of city *and* jurisdiction
> if both were lacking.  Would you wish to omit place if not on the item, even if
> known?  While 264  1 is descriptive, data lacking on the item may be (and
> SHOULD be) supplied if known.
> Square brackets make it clear what was supplied.  I assume Bibframe will
> have some equivalent to 588?
> 
> A "not identified" phrase would not be accurate if the data is known.
> 
> In splitting a single 260 into multiple 264s or Bibframe statements, it should
> be assumed that any data given only once (place, year) would apply to all two
> or three 264s or Bibframe statements.

Thanks for the info.  

> 
> Kevin's hope that the redundant standardized statement can be
> automatically produced from the transcribed statement, would easier with
> the provision of jurisdiction in the transcribed statement when
> not on the item.   

Agreed.  Ultimately, however, it is a cataloging/policy decision how such things as publication statements are recorded.

Otherwise, which London, Vancouver, or Paris would
> not be known.  It would be safer and much less complex programming to
> always provide jurisdiction, rather than assuming the absence of jurisdiction
> means the British London, French Paris, or British Columbia Vancouver.
> 
> 
> 
>    __       __   J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([log in to unmask])
>   {__  |   /     Special Libraries Cataloguing   HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
>   ___} |__
> \__________________________________________________________

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager