Thank you Amy. That was my understanding as well, but I am glad you confirmed it.
Annette
>>> Amy Turner <[log in to unmask]> 2014/08/27 12:49 PM >>>
In RDA, anything that is not designated as a "core element" is optional. 18.5.1.3 Recording Relationship Designators does not have this designation. The associated LC/PCC PS reads "LC practice: Provide an authorized access point in the bibliographic record for an illustrator in all cases of resources intended for children. Give the RDA appendix I designator "illustrator" in MARC 700 subfield $e."
In the BIBCO training materials, slide 9 in Module four, captioned "Relationship designators" says "LC policy: decisions in some LCPS; otherwise, cataloger judgment to use."
On OCLC, you will see a wide range of practices in using relationship designators. At Duke, we use them only for special collections.
Hope this helps,
Amy
Amy Turner
Monographic Cataloger and Authority Control Coordinator
Duke University Libraries
[log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Annette Ingram
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 5:24 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [PCCLIST] Relator codes
Dear colleagues
"
We are implementing RDA original cataloguing soon and I would like to know whether the usage of relator codes (#e) with authors, editors, corporate bodies, etc. is mandatory in RDA? We feel that it is sometimes superfluous (like #eauthor) but would not like to contravene mandatory RDA guidelines. If it is mandatory, could I please have a reference to present to my "critical" colleagues. I have been unsuccessful in finding a clear guideline thus far.
Thank you and kind regards.
Annette Ingram (Cataloguer & trainer, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa)
|