Sorry Clark. As far as I know and there is a lot of literature on the subject, the sampling frequency and bit depth were chosen because that was what could be recorded on PAL standard video fields. If you do the math. You see how it adds up nicely. Shai
If a stupid word substitution made you laugh, thank my iPhone
> On 10 בספט 2014, at 18:55, Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Yes, I wrote about that a few days ago. But the Beethoven length still
> determined sampling rate and bit length, within the 4 3/4" physical
>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Shai Drori <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> The Beethoven story is an urban myth. The truth is very lame. Remember the
>> old American Automobile radio standard that had two knobs, one on each
>> side, and space just wide enough for an 8-track cartridge in the middle?
>> That's the size that was chosen.
>> בתאריך 09/09/14 6:55 PM, ציטוט Paul Urbahns:
>> Paul Stamler wrote:
>>>> 5" was also an attractive size because the player for a 5" disc would fit
>>>> into the standard cutout in a car's dashboard. At the time many cars had
>>>> radio/cassette players, and the Compact Disc was intended as a
>>>> for the Compact Cassette, to use the formal names for each format.
>>> I agree Paul that makes a lot of sense, and even though Tom Fine makes a
>>> case fir Rock music, Rock is basically 2 - 3 minute songs compiled.
>>> I can see where you would take the longest classical piece (they are
>>> usually played through at once) and develop a playing time to fit. That
>>> all the others should.
>>> But as you say physical size was important (where have I heard that line
>>> before???) and we all remember how important the auto industry was to 8
>>> Paul Urbahns
>>> Radcliff, Ky
>> Shai Drori
>> Timeless Recordings
>> [log in to unmask]
>> שי דרורי
>> מומחה לשימור והמרה של אודיו וידאו וסרטים 8-35 ממ.