LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  September 2014

ARSCLIST September 2014

Subject:

Re: Accidental stereo (again)

From:

Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:44:26 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (60 lines)

I am pretty sure (based on photos and somewhat sketchy descriptions in magazine articles) that 
Cook's early stereo recordings were made with 2 widely spaced mics onto a Magnecorder staggered-head 
2-track. He is always shown monitoring with headphones. To me, this is clearly "binaural" recording 
methodology, which will only sound good through headphones. On speakers, there will be a very weak 
center, unless the speakers are spaced at headphone distance (ie right next to each other).

Now, I don't know whether Cook changed his setup or method when he came up with the dual-channel 
cutting and playback systems.

Here is a bunch of material on Emory Cook that I gave to Chris Sanchez to write up in his 
Preservation Sound blog:
http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=5695
and
http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6240

-- Tom Fine


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Biel" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Accidental stereo (again)


> On 04/09/2014, Tom Fine wrote:
>> I think, in the early stereo days, only Emory Cook consistently
>> recorded true "binaural" tapes, in other words those designed to be
>> listened to through headphones only.
>
> Are you sure of that.  My experience is exactly the opposite.  Cook
> produced exactly one CD.  It was a demonstration of a re-processing
> technique, and you had to sign an agreement not to copy it in order to
> get it.  the first track is a female blues singer.  For about 30 seconds
> the small combo is heard on the right track in mono with nothing on the
> left channel until she starts to sing.  It is like those Elvis and
> Beatles tapes meant for mix-down, but this is what Cook chose to start
> his demo CD.
>
> Because his dual groove system used a radial playback arm, he knew there
> would be phase shift problems. Plus the two bands were cut with
> different EQ curves. Thus it was vital that there be as little "center"
> channel as possible, that there be nothing that was strongly heard in
> both channels.  I've got about 20 discs but no arm for them.  When he
> did come out with single-groove stereo LPs the separation was extreme.
> Remember, this is the guy who did the atmospherics albums with two radio
> receivers hundreds of miles apart.  When he recorded the folk groups he
> stuck two mikes down in front of two different parts of the group.  I
> don't think he separated them into two rooms like RCA did that time when
> they split a group into two studios a city block apart, but listening to
> these with headphones leaves a hole in the middle where your head used
> to be.  Maybe some of his classical recordings used mikes close
> together, but that was a minority of his catalog.
>
> Mike Biel  [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
> 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Error during command authentication.

Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started.

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager