Assuming this review is correct, it's amazing that BMG would have been so cheap and lax as to not
include complete discographical information in the booklet. In my opinion, that kind of information
is a bare minimum for historical reissues. In the very least, this information should include master
matrix information, recording dates and locations.
-- Tom Fine
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Urbahns" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 12:51 PM
Subject: [ARSCLIST] Rachmaninoff plays Rachmaninoff
>> James Roth wrote:
>> >A while back I bought "Sergei Rachmaninoff - The Complete Recordings (10
>> >This is the box set with a picture of Rachmaninoff on the front.
>> >I just learned that there's been a reissue of that set and the box has a
>> picture of trees on the front.
>> >Does anyone know anything about THAT reissue, specifically, did they use
>> better styli for the transfers this time?
> Here is a review, since it is also BMG I assume its the same mastering job.
> You should be able to check the contents to see if they match up.