LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  September 2014

ARSCLIST September 2014

Subject:

Re: recording "cleanup" plugins and 192/24

From:

"Casey, Michael T" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:09:23 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

For those who need the authority of a best practices document to justify to higher-ups the time needed to perform azimuth adjustments for each tape, IASA-TC04 has this to say:

5.4.12 Corrections for Errors Caused by Misaligned Recording Equipment

5.4.12.1 Misalignment of recording equipment leads to recording imperfections, which can take manifold form. While many of them are not, or hardly correctable, some of these faults can objectively be detected and compensated for. It is imperative to take compensation measures in the replay process of the original documents incurred, as no such correction will be possible once the signal has been transferred to another carrier.

5.4.12.2 Azimuth and Tape Path Alignment: Inaccurate alignment of the record head of the original recording machine means that at replay, the signal retrieved will exhibit a reduced high frequency response, and, in the case of two or more track replay, an altered phase relationship between the two channels. Adjustment of the angle of the replay head such that the relationship of the head is in the same plane as the magnetised field on the tape is termed the azimuth adjustment and this simple adjustment can markedly improve the quality and intelligibility of the retrieved signal. There is no difficulty in training staff in this task, and good binaural hearing is all the measuring technology required. An accurate phase meter or oscilloscope will aid in the adjustment of mono and properly recorded tapes, they may, however, be misleading on tapes recorded on cheap, domestic equipment. In such cases aural judgement of the high frequencies should be relied on. Additionally or alternatively, a software programme providing a real time-spectrogram function can be used. Azimuth adjustment should be a routine part of all magnetic tape transfers.

5.4.12.3 Digital systems may correct the phase relationship of the signal (often described as azimuth correction), however, such procedures cannot retrieve the high frequency information that is lost. Azimuth adjustments must be made on the original tape before transfer commences.

Mike

------------
Mike Casey
Director of Technical Operations
Media Digitization and Preservation Initiative
Indiana University

-----Original Message-----
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tom Fine
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 7:51 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] recording "cleanup" plugins and 192/24

Hi Andrew:

It's interestng you bring up this topic. I was just reading the book that comes with the new Beatles In Mono LP box and they talk specifically about azimuth on the full-track tapes. Despite the fact that these mono masters were made in-house at Abbey Road, most of them on the same machines, the mastering engineer said he had to adjust azimuth on the fly as records were being cut, especially with the later albums where mono mixes were done days or months apart. His point was, azimuth was specific to each track on some albums. He had made notes and used a gauge-based azimuth adjustment on his Studer A80 playback deck, so he was able to make precise tweaks as the tape rolled between cuts, according to the book text.

I was taught, with full-track azimuth, that you really have to adjust to ear, how the top end sounds best. Keep in mind that time-damaged tapes and poorly slit tapes will likely "country lane" through the transport and wreak havoc with azimuth. Adjusting tones at the head of the full-track tape (when they exist) is somewhat helpful, but ears need to be the final judge.

Azimuth is a tricky thing and I'm still learning about it after 40 years of playing tapes. What I have learned is that it's really critical to solve the azimuth puzzle in the analog domain because problems can't be satisfactorily fixed in the digital domain.

For old full-track tapes, I am curious about using the center two tracks of a 4-track quarter-inch machine. I haven't done much with this, but when there are tones on the tape, you can get a scientific azimuth adjust with a scope. Many old tapes are edge-damaged and I wonder if it's better not to play the outer edges of the tape. However, the effects of country-laning may be even worse if you're grabbing two narrow bands of signal and either combining them or not.

If you want to hear a prime example of azimuth issues, get a copy of the "Sun Records Greatest Hits" 
LP that was sold on Record Store Day this year. The tapes were clearly and audibly played back with a 2-track head and either were in such poor shape that they couldn't go through the transport correctly or the playback engineer was inept. In any case, with many of the songs, if you combine them to mono, they flange, "phase effect" and go in and out of treble cancellation, telltale signs of being played out of azimuth. If you listen on a stereo cartridge and don't combine to mono, it's not as bad, it just sounds like bad edge-warp. I think it was inept playback all around, but I've never handled the tapes. I do bet that they'd sound better if played back either through a narrow-width single head capturing the middle 1/2 of the tape height or with the middle two tracks of a 4-track quarter-inch head with azimuth constantly monitored on a scope and tuned to ear.

By the way, even with the less than ideal playback and remastering, the tunes on that Sun LP jump right out the speakers, still hot and rockin' to this day.

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Dapuzzo" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 7:34 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] recording "cleanup" plugins and 192/24


> While I understand the importance of capturing output "above 20kHz" with
> the aforementioned tools, are there any tools available to help with
> azimuth adjustments?  Older recordings, especially those made in the field
> with machines that have been "banged up", may be recorded with azimuth that
> is slightly off.  Therefore, the higher frequencies may be lost or
> diminished if playback is not adjusted to the exact azimuth of the original
> recording.  Is the only tool available our ears listening as we manually
> adjust the azimuth?
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 6:18 PM, John K. Chester <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> At 04:49 PM 8/29/2014, Tom Fine wrote:
>>
>>> John, is there a modification for to remove those noises? Do 3rd party
>>> electronics also carry those noises or are they something with the power
>>> rails under the transport? Sorry if these are ignorant questions, I'm not
>>> that familiar with the innards of ATR's.
>>>
>>
>> I suspect this is neither the list nor the proper subject heading for
>> discussing such a highly technical issue, but here's a brief answer:
>>
>> I have never tried to clean up an ATR with stock electronics, although I
>> have a good idea of where to start.  I have no data on 3rd party
>> electronics other than Plangent's.  When I got the Plangent electronics to
>> be clean enough for our purposes, I stopped worrying about the problem.
>> Plangent does use a preamp in the headblock with a cable running directly
>> to our box, which helps keep things clean.
>>
>> I do find it a bit odd that folks doing 192k transfers often don't seem to
>> worry about how much signal gets from the tape to the tape machine output
>> above 20 kHz, and how much noise in that region comes from the machine
>> rather than the tape.  There are useful signals up there, and we know that
>> if the transfer captures them they can later be used to improve the quality
>> of the audio below 20 kHz that we can actually hear.
>>
>> -- John Chester
>>
>>
>>
>>  ----- Original Message ----- From: "John K. Chester" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 4:33 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] recording "cleanup" plugins and 192/24
>>>
>>>
>>>  At 05:06 PM 8/29/2014, Shai Drori wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So if I turn the display off the 28.8 kHz goes away?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No, that noise on an ATR is actually coming from the reel motor
>>>> drivers.  The display generates other noise which starts somewhere in the
>>>> mid-50's of kHz and has lots of harmonics.
>>>>
>>>> Turning off the display removes a lot of the noise spikes in the audio
>>>> output but not all of them.
>>>>
>>>> -- John Chester
>>>>
>>>
>
> 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager