LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME Archives

BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME  January 2015

BIBFRAME January 2015

Subject:

Re: What will things and strings look like?

From:

LAURA DAWSON <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 20 Jan 2015 13:37:10 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (46 lines)

Actually, Karen, the ISNI database is chock-full of local identifiers so
that the data contributors can ingest their ISNI information/assignments
back into their databases. So itıs likely that the ISNI database will
become a massive hub of local identifiers for public identities. However,
itıs likely that some of the for-profit data contributors (such as
ProQuest and Bowker) will not really want those local identifiers
distributed into the overall supply chain, so the problem becomes one of
access.

On 1/20/15, 1:32 PM, "Karen Coyle" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>On 1/20/15 8:59 AM, Svensson, Lars wrote:
>> I guess this is a general case: What do I do when I want link to an
>>authority file and the entity I want to link to isn't there (yet)?
>This comes up not only for name authorities but for anything for which
>there is an authoritative list. For names you could have your system
>mint a local ID just to get the record done -- and that is what makes
>sense in terms of the data flow. I'm not sure that the same solution
>makes sense for the controlled lists like genres, roles, etc.
>
>Eventually one would want to do cleanup on those local URIs, matching
>them where possible to universal identifiers. This is one of those areas
>where we need to think through the bigger picture workflow. There are
>libraries today that if they don't find a record in OCLC for their copy
>cataloging needs they actually set the book aside and come back in a
>week or so to see if a record has shown up. I don't think a workflow
>that sets aside an item for every missing URI is going to be viable, but
>having a load of local URIs that never get upgraded to community URIs
>isn't going to be a solution either.
>
>I believe that BIBFRAME's lightweight abstract layer is an attempt to
>respond to this, although the next step -- matching up local URIs to
>community URIs -- hasn't been addressed, AFAIK.
>
>Kelley has helpfully brought up questions and situations that occur
>during cataloging. It is very important that workflow issues be
>addressed, even if they do not alter the content of BIBFRAME data.
>
>kc
>
>-- 
>Karen Coyle
>[log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
>m: +1-510-435-8234
>skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager