LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME Archives

BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME  February 2015

BIBFRAME February 2015

Subject:

Re: A rant?

From:

"J. McRee Elrod" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 23 Feb 2015 10:13:38 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (78 lines)

Jeffrey posted:


>1. Cataloging visual materials proves to be no more difficult using
>MARC21 than some xml markup language.

That is our experience as well.  Despite MARC21's problems (coding
state university press publications as government documents, the
nonsensical order of notes in 5XX, too many fixed fields which differ
from genre to genre) we find that MARC functions well.  We find MARC,
like AACR2, functions as well for nonprint materials as well as for
print materials.  There is also the matter of legacy records as you
point out.

There is MARc'S great advantage of the language neutrality of numbered
fields, and the difficulty of expressing element distinctions in
verbal labels, e.g., 130 vs. 240.

>2.  The underlying costs of conversion from MARC21 to something else
>will impede the majority of libraries from undertaking this move.
  

There are MARC to Bibframe crosswalks.  SLC could probably adapt one
and could do the crosswalks for about $.10 per record.  But there are
free crosswalks online aren't there?  Whether smaller libraries would
have the IT skills to use them is another question.

>Can anyone tell me what my cost is and what my returns are going to
>be?


I suspect your major cost would be for an ILS which can utilize
Bibframe.  Even current "free" ILS have costs associated with them.

Sorry, I see no return for local library patrons.


>3.  The catalog is something at the local level.  We have thousands
>of records that are suppressed on purpose to guard materials from
>being borrowed ...


This is your first comment with which I have difficulty.  Why have a
resource which can not be located?  Rare and delicate materials would
be in a secure location, and perhaps only used on site.  But hiding
their existence seems strange to me.
  
My hesitancy over linked data differs from yours.  Here, whenever a
logging truck hits a power pole, we suffer the loss of Internet
connectivity; we wonder at the wisdom of having ones local catalogue
dependent on connectivity.  Some answer that data would be stored
locally.  If so, how would it be kept current with the Internet
version?  What about differences in form of entries, such as between
LC, LAC, VIAF, etc.?  I assume local information (such as notation of
an autograph) would be part of a local holdings record, as would
whether an item may circulate or not, be loaned on ILL or not.


The only reason I see to suppress a record is for a lost item which
may reappear or be replaced, and thus the record would be needed
again.

>I would rather see some time spent on further development of MARC21

Agreed.  But even more needed is attention to ILS development.  We
have not fully utilized the the riches contained in our MARC records.  
We are fiddling with the building blocks when we should be paying
attention to the structure.

I wonder if one of SLC's niche markets in the future will be
crosswalks from Bibframe to MARC for ILS still based on MARC?  We have
a major investment in MARC based systems.


   __       __   J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([log in to unmask])
  {__  |   /     Special Libraries Cataloguing   HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
  ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager