> -----Original Message-----
> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ian Fairclough
> Working with OCLC master 880929839 (LCCN 2014020850, title Beast
> feast), I have edited it to replace field 240 with field 700.
1. I await a thread or threads to pop up on OCLC-CAT asking why the 240 appears in the 700 $t. Or put another way, should OCLC master records be toyed with in this manner? Better off keeping this to the local catalog?
2. 700 with 2nd indicator "2" and, optionally I guess, a "Container of ..." designator.
Mark K. Ehlert O'Shaughnessy-Frey Library
Cataloging and Metadata University of St. Thomas
Librarian 2115 Summit Avenue
Phone: 651-962-5488 St. Paul, MN 55105
"Experience is by industry achieved // And perfected by
the swift course of time"--Shakespeare, "Two Gentlemen of
Verona," Act I, Scene iii