I’m new to following PCC efforts and this list, so maybe I need to
understand some of the issues more, but...
There’s a lot of focus on the literal here. Is there any effort to
encourage/require $u’s and $v's in authorities? If not already, I hope
this is in scope for PCC Strategic Direction 3. The authority should store
the singular and plural… and with the URI, an application can access the
most appropriate literal.
Similarly, I’d like to be able to use the 024 (or another field) for
capturing URIs *distinguishable from other identifier numbers*.
Related, it would be nice if we could visit best practice for storing
dereferenceable URIs in bibs, *distinguishable from other control
numbers*. I realize that there is the $0 for this (we’re using this in a
couple cases), but I would like to see something more like the $u $v
structure (where you know it’s a URI in the $u and the source is kept
separately). The following is almost there.
700 1 ‡a Ceci, Stephen John ‡e thesis advisor
On 2/27/15, 8:20 AM, "Ehlert, Mark K." <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ted P Gemberling
>> Here is the document we got in training which said repeat the 372 and
>> for different controlled vocabularies.
>Also supported by the fact that the $2 is non-repeatable.
>Mark K. Ehlert O'Shaughnessy-Frey Library
>Cataloging and Metadata University of St. Thomas
> Librarian 2115 Summit Avenue
>Phone: 651-962-5488 St. Paul, MN 55105
> "Experience is by industry achieved // And perfected by
>the swift course of time"--Shakespeare, "Two Gentlemen of
>Verona," Act I, Scene iii