LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  March 2015

ARSCLIST March 2015

Subject:

Re: maybe the end of ripoff "songwriting"

From:

Tim Conley <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 16 Mar 2015 15:23:34 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (120 lines)

That was Biz Markie who sampled O'Sullivan, not De La Soul.

-Tim

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> I meant to also say, if you appropriate someone's material, get their
> permission, then pay the damn royalties.
>
> Gilbert O'Sullivan did not want his song used in a rap context, that was
> the crux of his victorious lawsuit (aside from the fact that De La Soul had
> stolen it without asking). An author of copyrighted material has some
> rights to refuse usage in other works. One instance I can think of is say I
> wrote a hymn and some sort of "gangsta" rapper asked permission to use part
> of my hymn words in a song about doing something decidedly un-religious.
> Logically, I'd refuse, and I should have that right.
>
> -- Tom Fine
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Fine" <[log in to unmask]
> >
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 2:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] maybe the end of ripoff "songwriting"
>
>
>  I think there's a difference between referencing a song or melody and
>> outright ripping it off. Sampling is, and has been decided legally is,
>> outright ripping off others' work, and thus those people must be
>> compensated. Referencing -- using a riff or a run of notes, or taking a
>> lyric phrase, for instances -- is more of a gray area. It'll be interesting
>> to see how this Marvin Gaye descision ends up in the courts, and whether it
>> ends up being a Supreme Court test case. I think Robin Thicke/Pharell's
>> unoriginal tune more referenced than sampled that Marvin Gaye song, but
>> it's worth looking at the instructions to the jury, because they did get
>> relatively thick into the copyright weeds in deciding the case.
>>
>> David's reference to Bach is interesting, because I think Bach and
>> Beethoven and perhaps Dvorak and other composers who recycled "folk" songs
>> and melodies may have ended up in court under US Copyright law in 2015.
>> Does Beethoven's 9th outright "sample" large parts of a German drinking
>> song? Isn't that exactly what got De La Soul in trouble with Gilbert
>> O'Sullivan? It would be interesting to hear one of the copyright experts'
>> opine on that comparison.
>>
>> My disdain for the Thicke/Pharell situation is, if you can't come up with
>> an original song, just credit the originator and pay the damn royalties on
>> your hit. There's no shame in making a career covering other people's
>> material. Look at all the crooners out there, look at many Country music
>> icons, look at Sinatra, Presley, Ronstadt, etc etc. It's sleazy to
>> appropriate and not give credit, in any creative endeavor. I look at Led
>> Zeppelin ripping off Son House, Robert Johnson, Muddy Waters and others
>> with equal disdain, even though I happen to like their music a heck of a
>> lot better than Robin Thicke.
>>
>> -- Tom Fine
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Lewis" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 1:24 PM
>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] maybe the end of ripoff "songwriting"
>>
>>
>>  Grandpa Jones' tune -- and incidentally, I just delivered a talk on him
>>> at
>>> the Library Wednesday -- was his hit "Old Rattler" in the 1947 King
>>> recording.
>>> Pete Seeger's was something called "Old Gray Mule" from an album "Birds,
>>> Beasts, Bugs and Little Fishes" that Rebecca had known since
>>> childhood, but I'd never heard. I think Pete Seeger's recording is later,
>>> but not much so. One thing both have in common is that they were big
>>> fans of Cousin Emmy.
>>>
>>> Dave Lewis
>>> Hamilton, OH
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Paul Stamler <[log in to unmask]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  On 3/16/2015 9:31 AM, David Lewis wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Just last night Rebecca pointed out to me an instance
>>>>> where Grandpa Jones and Pete Seeger used exactly the same musical
>>>>> setting
>>>>> for two different songs. Which of them wrote it? Neither of them; it
>>>>> was
>>>>> something that was out there before either of them and they simply
>>>>> fitted
>>>>> what they
>>>>> knew to lyrics that were also around.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Just out of curiosity, what were the Grandpa Jones & Pete Seeger songs?
>>>>
>>>>  Old hymns also tend to be profligate
>>>>
>>>>  in terms of what they are set to.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Read the Sacred Harp hymnal, and you'll find the same words set to half
>>>> a
>>>> dozen tunes.
>>>>
>>>> The crossover between "sacred" and "profane" was a big deal; for
>>>> example,
>>>> "Come Ye That Fear the Lord" used the tune of "Captain Kidd". And my
>>>> favorite example, Alfred Karnes's use of the tune from "Don't Let Your
>>>> Deal
>>>> Go Down" with the lyrics to "The Promised Land" (rec. 1927 for Victor).
>>>>
>>>> Peace,
>>>> Paul
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Error during command authentication.

Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started.

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager