We have one small collection described in EAD but other than stating matrix numbers and trying to note how the item was released, it's pretty straightforward. If I had the time I would probably make MARC records, too.
If I had been able to make MARC records I would have done that first then exported all the records in XML and used a stylesheet to convert to EAD. In this case I probably made a database in Access and exported as XML and converted using a stylesheet.
It's a challenge finding best practices or even most common practices for anything like this, isn't it?
John Bewley, Ph.D.
University at Buffalo
716 645 0614
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Patrick J Midtlyng
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 12:14 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [ARSCLIST] Best Practice for describing Test Pressings and Radio Transcriptions
Apologies for redundancies, I just wanted to get the most eyes on this question.
I've been looking at various archives and libraries to get a sense to how people are describing test pressings (and radio broadcast transcriptions). We currently have some in our Finding Aids, but as we look to start describing some other collections I wanted to poll the crowd. How do you describe these things: MARC and AARC2/RDA or EAD in finding aids? How was this decision made and what went into your choice to use one method over the other?
Patrick J Midtlyng
Sound Archivist, Belfer Audio Archive
Special Collections Research Center
Syracuse University Libraries
email: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>